Paul pense que la décoration est fragile, il évite donc de la lâcher brusquement.

Paul thinks the decoration is fragile, so he avoids letting it go abruptly.

Breakdown of Paul pense que la décoration est fragile, il évite donc de la lâcher brusquement.

• être: to be
• Paul: Paul
• il: he
• de: of
• donc: so
• que: that
• penser: to think
• la décoration: the decoration
• éviter: to avoid
• lâcher: to let go
• fragile: fragile
• la: it
• brusquement: abruptly

Questions & Answers about Paul pense que la décoration est fragile, il évite donc de la lâcher brusquement.

What is the function of “que” in the clause “Paul pense que la décoration est fragile”?

“Que” acts as a subordinating conjunction, introducing the subordinate clause “la décoration est fragile.” It works much like the English “that” when connecting a main clause with additional information about what Paul thinks.

Why is the adverb “donc” used in this sentence, and what role does it play?

“Donc” means “therefore” or “so” and is used to indicate a logical consequence. In this sentence, it links Paul’s belief about the decoration’s fragility to his decision to handle it carefully—for example, by avoiding a sudden drop.

Why is the pronoun “la” placed before the infinitive “lâcher” instead of after it?

In French, object pronouns must be positioned before the verb they relate to. Here, “la” refers to “la décoration” (noting its feminine gender) and correctly precedes the infinitive “lâcher” in the structure “évite de la lâcher brusquement.”

Why is the structure “évite de la lâcher” used instead of simply “évite lâcher la”?

The verb “éviter” is conventionally followed by the preposition “de” before an infinitive when expressing the idea of avoiding an action. This means that “évite de la lâcher” is the correct construction, and the object pronoun “la” must precede the infinitive “lâcher.”

What does “brusquement” mean, and how does it affect the sentence’s meaning?

“Brusquement” translates to “abruptly” or “suddenly.” It qualifies the action by describing the manner in which Paul avoids letting go of the decoration, emphasizing that he is careful not to drop it in a sudden or careless way.

Why is the sentence divided by a comma, and could another punctuation mark be used instead?

The comma separates two closely related independent clauses: one stating Paul’s thought about the decoration and the other describing his consequent cautious action. While a semicolon or period could also separate these ideas, the comma creates a smooth flow, clearly linking the reasoning with its outcome.