Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin.

Breakdown of Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin.

myöhemmin
later
tulla
to come
että
that
sanoa
to say
hän
she
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin.

Why is hän used twice? Does it mean he or she?

Yes. Hän can mean either he or she. Finnish does not normally mark gender in third-person singular pronouns.

So in Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin, both instances of hän could refer to:

  • he
  • she

Usually the context tells you which person is meant.

It is also normal to repeat hän in the second clause, just as English often repeats he/she in He said that he will come later.

What does että mean here?

Että means that and introduces a subordinate clause.

So:

  • Hän sanoi = He/She said
  • että hän tulee myöhemmin = that he/she will come later

It works very much like English that in reported speech.

Why is tulee in the present tense if the first verb sanoi is in the past?

This is a very common question for English speakers.

In Finnish, after a past reporting verb like sanoi (said), the verb in the että-clause often stays in the present if the action is still future or current from the original point of view.

So:

  • sanoi = said
  • tulee literally looks like comes, but here it means will come / is coming

Finnish does not follow English-style backshifting in the same way. English often changes:

  • He says: I will come later
  • He said that he would come later

Finnish commonly keeps:

  • Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin.

So even though tulee is formally present tense, the meaning can be future from the context.

What form is sanoi?

Sanoi is the past tense of sanoa (to say).

More specifically, it is:

  • 3rd person singular
  • past tense

So:

  • minä sanoin = I said
  • hän sanoi = he/she said

In this sentence, sanoi tells us that the act of speaking happened in the past.

What exactly does tulee mean here?

Tulee is from the verb tulla, which means to come.

Here it is:

  • 3rd person singular
  • present tense form

So:

  • hän tulee = he/she comes
  • but in context, it often means he/she will come or is coming

Finnish often uses the present tense for future meaning when the context makes the time clear.

What does myöhemmin mean, and what kind of word is it?

Myöhemmin means later.

It is an adverb, so it describes when something happens.

In this sentence:

  • hän tulee myöhemmin = he/she will come later

It is related to myöhäinen (late) and myöhään (late, as an adverb), but myöhemmin specifically means later.

Why is the word order hän tulee myöhemmin and not something else?

This is the normal, neutral Finnish word order:

  • hän = subject
  • tulee = verb
  • myöhemmin = adverb

So it follows a basic subject–verb–adverb pattern.

Finnish word order is fairly flexible, but the version in your sentence is the most neutral and natural one.

For example:

  • Hän tulee myöhemmin. = neutral: He/She will come later.
  • Myöhemmin hän tulee. = possible, but more marked or context-dependent
Is the comma before että necessary?

Yes, in standard written Finnish, a comma is normally used before a subordinate clause introduced by että.

So the standard form is:

  • Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin.

This is similar to careful written English, where a clause beginning with that may also be separated depending on style, though Finnish punctuation rules are more regular here.

Can että be left out?

In standard written Finnish, että is normally kept in this kind of sentence.

So the standard sentence is:

  • Hän sanoi, että hän tulee myöhemmin.

In spoken Finnish, people may sometimes shorten or alter structures, but for a learner, it is best to use että in reported speech like this.

How would this sentence sound in more natural English-style reported speech?

A learner may notice that a very literal gloss gives something like He/She said that he/she comes later, which sounds odd in English.

A more natural English translation is:

  • He said that he would come later.
  • She said that she would come later.
  • sometimes He/She said that he/she was coming later.

This is because English and Finnish handle tense differently in reported speech. Finnish uses tulee, but English usually shifts the tense to would come or was coming.

Could the second hän refer to a different person from the first one?

Yes, it could, depending on context.

Grammatically, the sentence only says:

  • He/She said that he/she will come later

The two instances of hän do not have to refer to the same person. In real conversation, context tells you whether:

  • one person said that they themselves would come later, or
  • one person said that another person would come later

If you need to make the meaning clearer, Finnish often uses names or other nouns instead of relying only on pronouns.