Learn Hardcore Finnish: Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla. - In the evenings I go to the balcony to imagine a quiet cottage by the lake.

Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla.

In the evenings I go to the balcony to imagine a quiet cottage by the lake.

Breakdown of Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla.

What exactly does iltaisin mean, and how is it different from illalla?

Iltaisin is a time adverb that means in the evenings / on evenings (habitually).

Grammatically, it’s built from the plural illat (evenings) plus the ending -sin, which makes a “habitual time” adverb:

ilta = evening
iltaisin = in the evenings (as a regular habit)

By contrast:

illalla = in the evening (on one specific evening or a specific point in time)

So:

Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle… = In general, as a habit, I go to the balcony in the evenings.
Illalla menen parvekkeelle… = (This) evening / tonight I will go to the balcony.

In spoken Finnish you will often hear iltasin instead of iltaisin; it’s the same word, just a colloquial pronunciation/spelling.

What is the difference between iltaisin and joka ilta?

Both suggest something happens regularly in the evenings, but the nuance is a bit different:

iltaisin = generally, in the evenings, that’s when this tends to happen; it focuses more on the time of day as your usual time.
joka ilta = every evening, each and every evening, with a slightly stronger sense that there are no exceptions.

So:

Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle.
= In the evenings I (usually) go to the balcony. (A typical routine, but you might skip some days.)
Joka ilta menen parvekkeelle.
= I go to the balcony every evening. (Sounds more systematic: every single evening.)

What does the ending -lle in parvekkeelle mean, and how does it compare to parvekkeella and parvekkeelta?

The -lle ending is the allative case, which often means to / onto / to the surface of something.

With parveke (balcony):

parveke = a balcony (basic form)
parvekkeelle = to the balcony / onto the balcony (allative: movement to a location)
parvekkeella = on the balcony (adessive: being on a location)
parvekkeelta = from the balcony (ablative: movement from a location)

So menen parvekkeelle literally means I go to (onto) the balcony.
If you were already there, you would say:

Olen parvekkeella. = I am on the balcony.
Tulen parvekkeelta. = I come from the balcony.

Why is kuvitella in the form kuvittelemaan here?

Kuvittelemaan is the third infinitive in the illative case (often called the -maan / -mään form).

After verbs of movement like mennä (to go), this form expresses purpose:

mennä nukkumaan = to go (in order) to sleep
lähteä ostamaan maitoa = to leave (in order) to buy milk
tulla katsomaan = to come (in order) to see

So:

menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan…
= I go to the balcony to imagine / in order to imagine…

Literally it’s something like I go to the balcony into imagining, but in natural English we just say to imagine. Finnish uses this structure very regularly with movement + purpose.

How do you form this -maan / -mään form (kuvittelemaan) for other verbs?

A practical learner’s method:

Take the 1st person singular present form.
- Example: minä kuvittelen (I imagine)
Remove the final -n to get the verb stem.
- kuvittelen → kuvittele-
Add -maan or -mään depending on vowel harmony:
- Back vowels (a, o, u) → -maan
- Front vowels (ä, ö, y) → -mään

For kuvitella:

Stem: kuvittele-
Vowels are e, e, e, a (neutral + back), so we use -maan → kuvittelemaan.

Some more examples:

nukkua → nukun → nuku- + maan → nukkumaan (to go to sleep)
opiskella → opiskelen → opiskele- + maan → opiskelemaan (to go study)
lukea → luen → lue- + maan → lukemaan (to go read)
syödä → syön → syö- + mään → syömään (to go eat)

There are some stem changes with certain verb types, but this “take minä-form minus -n, then add -maan / -mään” rule works very often in practice.

Could you also say Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle ja kuvittelen hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla? Would it mean the same?

Yes, that sentence is grammatical and understandable.

The difference is nuance:

menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan…
→ Highlights purpose directly: I go to the balcony in order to imagine…
menen parvekkeelle ja kuvittelen…
→ Describes two actions in sequence: I go to the balcony and (then) I imagine…
The idea of purpose is still easy to infer from context, but it is not built into the grammar as clearly.

In everyday speech, both patterns can be used, but Finnish strongly favors mennä + -maan/-mään when you explicitly want to say go to do X.

Why is it hiljaista mökkiä and not hiljainen mökki?

Hiljaista mökkiä is in the partitive singular:

mökki = cottage (nominative, basic form)
mökkiä = cottage (partitive singular)
hiljainen = quiet (adjective, nominative)
hiljaista = quiet (adjective, partitive singular)

The adjective hiljaista matches the noun mökkiä in case and number.

With verbs like kuvitella (to imagine), Finnish often uses the partitive object when the thing is:

not concrete or not fully delimited (vague, imagined, or “ongoing”), or
seen as an unbounded process, not a completed, whole result.

Imagining a quiet cottage is an ongoing mental activity; you don’t “complete” or “use up” the cottage. So partitive is natural: you are imagining some quiet cottage, not necessarily a specific one.

If you used hiljainen mökki as a nominative object here, it would sound wrong; the object has to be in object case, and with this verb and meaning, that case is usually partitive (hiljaista mökkiä).

How would the meaning change if you said kuvittelen hiljaisen mökin instead of kuvittelen hiljaista mökkiä?

Hiljaisen mökin is a total object (genitive/accusative), which usually suggests something:

more specific, and
viewed as a whole, delimited thing.

So:

kuvittelen hiljaista mökkiä
→ I’m imagining a quiet cottage (in general), not necessarily a specific one; the focus is on the ongoing imagining. (This is the natural, neutral way to say it.)
kuvittelen hiljaisen mökin
→ I’m imagining the/that quiet cottage as a whole.
This might imply you have one particular cottage in mind, or that you are deliberately constructing one specific image as a complete whole (for example, in a visualization exercise).

In normal talk about a daydream or a fantasy, hiljaista mökkiä is far more common and idiomatic. The total object hiljaisen mökin sounds more pointed and specific and is less typical in this general, dreamy context.

What exactly does järven rannalla mean, word by word?

Breakdown:

järvi = lake
järven = of the lake (genitive singular)
ranta = shore, beach, bank
rannalla = on the shore / at the shore (adessive case: on, at)

So järven rannalla literally means:

on the shore of the lake

In natural English you’d usually say by the lake or by a lake.

There’s also a small sound change:

ranta → rannalla: t → nn due to consonant gradation, a regular Finnish pattern.

Why is it järven rannalla and not järvellä or järven luona?

All three are possible Finnish expressions, but their images are slightly different:

järven rannalla
= on the shore of the lake.
This is the typical phrase for where a cottage is located. You picture the building standing on land right next to the water’s edge.
järvellä
= on the lake (on the water surface or ice).
You’d use this for a boat, swimming, or being out on the lake:
- Olemme järvellä. = We are out on the lake.
järven luona
= near the lake, by the lake, but not necessarily on the shore itself. It is more vague about exact placement.

For a mökki in a very typical Finnish landscape, järven rannalla is the natural choice: a cottage standing on the lake’s shore.

In the phrase hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla, is järven rannalla describing the cottage or the act of imagining?

In normal interpretation, järven rannalla describes the cottage, not the act of imagining.

So the meaning is:

I go to the balcony to imagine *a quiet cottage that is by the lake.*

You could make that relationship explicit:

…kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä, joka on järven rannalla.
(= …to imagine a quiet cottage that is by the lake.)

or more compactly:

…kuvittelemaan hiljaista järven rannalla olevaa mökkiä.
(= …to imagine a quiet cottage that is located by the lake.)

Technically, prepositional-like phrases can sometimes attach to different parts of the sentence, but here context helps:

You are on a balcony (probably not by the lake).
The phrase järven rannalla directly follows mökkiä, so the most natural reading is: the cottage is by the lake.

Can the word order in this sentence be changed, for example Parvekkeelle menen iltaisin kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla? Does that sound natural?

Yes, Finnish word order is relatively flexible, and that version is grammatical.

However, changing the order can change emphasis:

Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan…
→ Neutral, natural order: time (iltaisin) first, then verb and place.
Parvekkeelle menen iltaisin kuvittelemaan…
→ Puts extra emphasis on parvekkeelle:
It’s to the balcony (as opposed to somewhere else) that I go in the evenings to imagine…

For a neutral description of a routine, the original order is more typical:

Iltaisin menen parvekkeelle kuvittelemaan hiljaista mökkiä järven rannalla.

You can move elements around for stylistic reasons or to highlight what is most important, but you usually keep:

the motion verb (menen) close to the place (parvekkeelle), and
the purpose verb (kuvittelemaan) close to its object (hiljaista mökkiä).