Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan.

Breakdown of Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan.

minä
I
-ssa
in
käydä
to go
ennen kuin
before
lähteä
to go
juosta
to run
vessa
the toilet
ulos
out
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan.

Why is it käyn and not menen at the beginning?

Both käyn (from käydä) and menen (from mennä) can translate as I go, but they have different nuances.

  • Käydä means to go (somewhere) briefly and come back / pay a visit.

    • Käyn vessassa = I go to the toilet (and then I come back / it’s a short visit).
    • Käyn kaupassa = I go to the store (and then come back).
  • Mennä is more neutral: just to go (movement from here to there), without the “short visit” nuance.

    • Menen vessaan = I go to the toilet (focus on the movement to it).

In this sentence, käyn vessassa fits well because going to the toilet is naturally a short, temporary visit before doing something else. Using käydä is idiomatic in Finnish for these quick “go and come back” actions.

Why is it vessassa with -ssa, and not vessaan?

The difference comes from Finnish local cases:

  • vessassa = in the toilet/bathroom (inessive case: inside a place)
  • vessaan = into the toilet (illative case: movement into a place)

With käydä, Finnish usually uses the inessive (-ssa/-ssä) to express “visit somewhere”:

  • käyn vessassa = I (go and) visit the toilet
  • käyn kaupassa = I visit the shop
  • käyn kirjastossa = I go to the library (briefly)

So käydä + inessive is a fixed, very common pattern.

You can say menen vessaan using mennä + illative to stress entering the place, but once you choose käyn, the natural companion is vessassa.

Why isn’t there a comma before ennen kuin?

Finnish comma rules differ from English.

  • In English, we’d usually write:
    I go to the bathroom, before I go out running. (comma optional, depending on style)

  • In Finnish, the rule is:

    • When the main clause comes first and the subordinate clause comes after, there is no comma:
      • Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan.
    • When the subordinate clause comes first, you do use a comma:
      • Ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan, käyn vessassa.

So in the original order, no comma is correct Finnish punctuation.

Why do we need both ennen and kuin? Would ennen lähden be wrong?

Yes, ennen lähden would be wrong.

  • ennen by itself is a preposition/postposition that normally takes a noun or a noun phrase:

    • ennen lähtöä = before the departure
    • ennen juoksua = before the run
  • When ennen is followed by a full clause with a finite verb, you must add kuin:

    • ennen kuin lähden = before I leave
    • ennen kuin syön = before I eat
    • ennen kuin menemme kotiin = before we go home

So the pattern is:

  • ennen + noun
  • ennen kuin + full clause (with a conjugated verb)

That’s why you need ennen kuin lähden, not ennen lähden.

What does lähden ulos juoksemaan literally look like grammatically?

Broken down:

  • lähden

    • verb lähteä = to leave, to depart
    • lähden = I leave / I’m leaving
  • ulos

    • adverb meaning out, to the outside (direction outward)
  • juoksemaan

    • from juosta = to run
    • this is the third infinitive in illative (juoksema
      • -anjuoksemaan)
    • used after verbs of movement to show purpose: “in order to run”

So the structure is:

  • lähden (I leave)
  • ulos (to the outside)
  • juoksemaan (in order to run)

Altogether: I leave out to run → more naturally: I go out running / I go out for a run.

What exactly is juoksemaan, and why not just juosta?

Juoksemaan is:

  • the third infinitive (-ma/mä-form) of juosta
  • in the illative case (-an/än)

Forming it:

  • juosta → stem juokse-
  • third infinitive base: juoksema-
  • illative ending: -anjuoksemaan

This form is very important in Finnish after verbs of movement (mennä, lähteä, tulla, etc.) to express purpose:

  • lähden juoksemaan = I leave in order to run
  • menen nukkumaan = I go to sleep (in order to sleep)
  • tulen syömään = I come to eat

Using juosta (the basic infinitive) after lähden would be ungrammatical in this purpose construction. The correct pattern is:

  • movement verb + third infinitive (illative)
    lähden ulos juoksemaan
Why is it ulos and not something like ulkona or ulkoon?

Finnish has several related “out” forms:

  • ulkona = outside (state, location: where?)
    • Olen ulkona. = I am outside.
  • ulos = out (direction: to where?)
    • Menen ulos. = I go out.
  • ulkoa = from outside (from where?)
    • Tulen ulkoa. = I come from outside.
  • ulkoon is archaic/poetic and not used in everyday standard language.

In this sentence we’re talking about movement to the outside, so the directional adverb ulos is the correct choice:

  • lähden ulos = I leave (to go) out(doors)
Could I say “Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden juoksemaan ulos” instead? Is that still correct?

Yes, Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden juoksemaan ulos is grammatically correct and understandable.

The difference is mostly about information flow and emphasis:

  • lähden ulos juoksemaan

    • feels like: I go out (for the purpose of) running.
    • common, very natural phrasing.
  • lähden juoksemaan ulos

    • focuses more on the action of running, then adds out as a location/direction detail.
    • also possible, but slightly less common / smooth in this particular everyday phrase.

Native speakers would generally prefer lähden ulos juoksemaan, but your alternative is still correct Finnish.

Why is the present tense (käyn, lähden) used for something that sounds like the future in English?

Finnish does not have a separate future tense. The present tense does double duty:

  • present time
  • future time (especially when context makes it clear)

Examples:

  • Huomenna lähden aikaisin.
    Tomorrow I’ll leave early.

  • Soitan sinulle myöhemmin.
    I’ll call you later.

In your sentence, the sequence ennen kuin and the typical action pattern make it clearly about future or habitual time, even though the verbs are in present:

  • Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan.
    = I (will) go to the bathroom before I go out running.
    or = I (usually) go to the bathroom before I go out running.

So this is normal: Finnish present tense + time/context → future meaning.

Is the whole sentence informal, neutral, or formal? Are there more formal alternatives?

The sentence is neutral, everyday spoken/written Finnish. Nothing is particularly slangy or overly formal.

  • vessa is the common everyday word for toilet / bathroom.
    • More formal/technical: WC or wc (pronounced veesee), käymälä (quite formal/official).

More formal variants might look like:

  • Käyn WC:ssä ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan.
  • Käyn käymälässä ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan. (sounds official/bureaucratic)

In normal conversation and most writing, Käyn vessassa ennen kuin lähden ulos juoksemaan is perfectly natural and idiomatic.