Learn Hardcore Filipino: Malamig na naman sa umaga. - It is cold again in the morning.

Malamig na naman sa umaga.

It is cold again in the morning.

Breakdown of Malamig na naman sa umaga.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Filipino grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Filipino now

Questions & Answers about Malamig na naman sa umaga.

What do the words na and naman each mean here, and what do they express together as na naman?

Individually:

na – often means already / now / anymore, or marks a change of state (something is now the case).
naman – adds nuance like again / on the other hand / by the way / actually, depending on context. It’s often used to soften what you’re saying or show a bit of emotion or attitude.

Together, in Malamig na naman sa umaga, na naman:

suggests that the situation has returned:
→ It’s cold again in the morning (like before).
carries a small emotional shade, which could be:
- neutral: just noting a recurring situation
- mildly complaining, surprised, or resigned, depending on tone

So na naman here is roughly “again (already/now)”, with a hint that this has happened before and is notable to the speaker.

Why is there no word for “it” in this sentence? How can the sentence be complete without a subject?

Filipino often doesn’t use an explicit “it” the way English does.

In Malamig na naman sa umaga, the main idea is:
- Malamig – cold
  Literally, you can read it as: “Cold again in the morning.”
  The “it is” part is just understood from context.

In Filipino:

Adjectives like malamig can function as the whole predicate/verb, similar to “to be cold.”
The subject (the thing that is cold) is often implicit or understood from context, especially for weather and general conditions.

So this sentence works fine without a pronoun:

Malamig na naman sa umaga.
→ (It’s) cold again in the morning.

The “it” is unnecessary because the sentence is describing the general condition in the morning, not a specific “thing” that needs to be named.

Could I say “Malamig sa umaga na naman” instead? Is the word order flexible?

You can sometimes move na naman, but it’s most natural to keep it right after malamig:

Most natural: Malamig na naman sa umaga.
Acceptable (but less common / slightly marked): Malamig sa umaga na naman.

When na naman appears right after the predicate (malamig), it directly qualifies the condition:

Malamig na naman… → It’s cold again…

If you move na naman later:

Malamig sa umaga na naman.
This is understandable, but it can sound a bit off for everyday speech, or it can make “in the morning” feel like the repeated element instead of the coldness itself.

For learners, it’s best to stick with:

[Predicate] + na naman + [time/other phrase]
→ Malamig na naman sa umaga.

Is Malamig sa umaga (without na naman) also correct? What changes in meaning?

Yes, Malamig sa umaga is perfectly correct.

Malamig sa umaga.
→ It’s cold in the morning.

Without na naman, you lose the idea of repetition or “again.” The sentence becomes a simple statement of fact or description:

With na naman:
→ It’s cold again in the morning (like before / suddenly again).
Without na naman:
→ It’s (simply) cold in the morning. (no implication that this is a repeat event)

So na naman adds the nuance that the coldness is recurring, or has returned after a break.

What is the role of sa in sa umaga? Why not use ng umaga?

Both sa umaga and ng umaga can appear in time expressions, but they have different typical uses.

sa umaga
- Basic meaning: “in the morning / during the morning.”
- sa marks a time or place.
- In this sentence, sa umaga tells you when it is cold.
ng umaga
- Often part of more fixed expressions like:
  - kaninang umaga – earlier this morning
  - isang umaga – one morning
  - tuwing umaga – every morning
- Or used with verbs/adjectives that take ng-phrases.

In Malamig na naman sa umaga, sa umaga is the natural choice because we’re simply saying “(in) the morning” as a time frame.
If you tried Malamig na naman ng umaga, it would sound unusual or wrong to native speakers in this context.

Is this sentence in the present tense, past tense, or something else? Filipino doesn’t seem to mark tense here.

Filipino often does not mark tense directly on adjectives. Instead, time words and context tell you when something happens.

Malamig na naman sa umaga.

Without extra context, this most naturally reads as present / general:

It’s (now) cold again in the mornings / in the morning.

However, depending on context and tone, it can also be used:

As a habitual statement:
→ It tends to be cold again in the morning (these days).
In a narrative context (with past time already established):
→ It was cold again in the morning.

So grammatically it’s aspect-neutral, and “time” is understood from context rather than from a tense ending.

What exactly is malamig here? Is it an adjective, a verb, or something like “to be cold”?

Malamig is an adjective in Filipino, but adjectives can function very much like stative verbs.

In Malamig na naman sa umaga:

malamig is the predicate, describing a state or condition: cold.
There’s no separate “to be” verb (like “is”); malamig itself does the job of “is cold.”

You can think of it as:

malamig ≈ “is cold” / “to be cold” (when used as the predicate)

So the structure is:

[Adjective predicate] + (particles like na/naman) + [time phrase]
→ Malamig na naman sa umaga.
→ (It) is cold again in the morning.

Can I say “Malamig na naman ang umaga”? How is that different from Malamig na naman sa umaga?

Yes, Malamig na naman ang umaga is grammatically correct, but the nuance shifts slightly.

Malamig na naman sa umaga.
- Literally: Cold again in the morning.
- Focus is on the time frame: mornings are when it is cold.
- Often feels more like a general weather / condition statement.
Malamig na naman ang umaga.
- Literally: The morning is cold again.
- ang umaga is explicitly made the topic/subject – the morning itself.
- Feels a bit more poetic or descriptive, like you’re talking about “the morning” as a thing with a property.

Both can translate as “It’s cold again in the morning,” but:

sa umaga version sounds more like a time-based condition.
ang umaga version sounds more like you’re attributing the coldness to “the morning” itself, almost personifying it.

How would I say “It’s getting cold again in the morning” (emphasizing the change), not just “It’s cold again”?

To emphasize that the cold is starting / increasing again, you can add nagsisimula or lumalamig:

Nagsisimula na namang malamig sa umaga.
- Literally: It’s starting to be cold again in the mornings.
Lumalamig na naman sa umaga.
- lumalamig – is becoming/getting cold (progressive aspect)
- Literally: It’s getting cold again in the mornings.

The original:

Malamig na naman sa umaga.
→ It’s (already) cold again in the morning.

The modified ones highlight the process of becoming cold, not just the state.

What is the difference between na naman and uli/ulî (again)? Could I say Malamig uli sa umaga?

Yes, you can say Malamig uli sa umaga, and it’s understandable and natural, but there are nuance differences:

uli / ulî – straightforward “again”, focusing on repetition.
- Malamig uli sa umaga. → It’s cold again in the morning (repeated event).
na naman – also often “again”, but:
- can add a shade of emotion, attitude, or mild complaint/surprise.
- is very common in casual, conversational Filipino.

Compare:

Malamig uli sa umaga.
→ More neutral, just stating that it is repeated.
Malamig na naman sa umaga.
→ Similar meaning, but can carry a sense like:
- Ugh, it’s cold again in the morning.
- Wow, it’s cold again in the morning.
  depending on tone.

For everyday speech, na naman is extremely common and feels very natural in this kind of sentence.

If I want to say “every morning” instead of just “in the morning,” how would I change sa umaga?

To express “every morning”, use tuwing umaga or araw-araw sa umaga, depending on the nuance:

Malamig na naman tuwing umaga.
- tuwing umaga – every morning / each morning
- Suggests a recurring pattern: it’s cold again each morning.
Malamig na naman araw-araw sa umaga.
- araw-araw sa umaga – every day in the morning
- A bit more explicit, emphasizes daily frequency.

Original:

Malamig na naman sa umaga.
→ could refer to this morning, these days in the morning, or mornings in general, depending on context.

With tuwing umaga, you clearly show it’s an every-morning habit or pattern.

Why isn’t there any marker like “ay” in this sentence? Could I say “Malamig na naman sa umaga ay…”?

The ay marker is used in inverted / formal structures, usually:

[Topic] + ay + [Predicate]

For example:

Malamig na naman ang umaga.
→ You could invert it as:
Ang umaga ay malamig na naman.

But Malamig na naman sa umaga already has the predicate first pattern, which is the normal spoken order:

[Predicate] + (particles) + [time phrase]

There’s no place for ay here because you’re not fronting a topic like ang umaga. Adding ay:

Malamig na naman sa umaga ay…
would sound ungrammatical or at least very unnatural.

So:

Predicate-first, conversational:
→ Malamig na naman sa umaga. (natural)
Topic-fronted, more formal/literary (if you want ay):
→ Ang umaga ay malamig na naman.

Can Malamig na naman sa umaga refer to just this specific morning, or does it always mean many mornings?

It can refer to either, depending on context and intonation:

Specific, recent morning (often with context like talking about today’s weather):
- Someone wakes up, feels the cold, and says:
  Malamig na naman sa umaga.
  → It’s cold again in the morning (today).
General or ongoing pattern:
- Talking about the season or recent days:
  Malamig na naman sa umaga ngayon.
  → It’s cold again in the mornings nowadays.
- Or even without ngayon, context can make it clearly habitual.

Filipino often leaves this flexible, and the surrounding conversation plus time words (like ngayon – today/now, tuwing – every) clarify whether it’s one morning or mornings in general.