Breakdown of La instruistino klarigas la eraron kaj montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo.
Questions & Answers about La instruistino klarigas la eraron kaj montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo.
Why is instruistino used here instead of instruisto?
Instruistino means female teacher.
- instruisto = teacher
- -in- = female
- instruistino = female teacher
Esperanto often builds words this way:
- patro = father
- patrino = mother
- kato = cat
- katino = female cat
So this sentence specifically tells you the teacher is a woman.
Why does the sentence begin with la?
La is the definite article, meaning the.
In this sentence:
- la instruistino = the teacher
- la eraron = the mistake
- la ĝustan respondon = the correct answer
- la tabulo = the board
Unlike English, Esperanto has only one article: la. It does not change for gender, number, or case.
Why do eraron and respondon end in -n?
The -n ending marks the direct object in Esperanto. That is, it shows what is being explained or shown.
Here:
- klarigas la eraron = explains the mistake
- montras la ĝustan respondon = shows the correct answer
The teacher is doing the action, and the mistake/answer receive the action, so they take -n.
This is called the accusative ending.
Why is it ĝustan respondon and not ĝusta respondo?
Because adjectives must agree with the nouns they describe.
- respondo = answer
- ĝusta respondo = a correct answer
- la ĝustan respondon = the correct answer
Since respondon has:
- -o for noun
- -n for direct object
the adjective must match:
- ĝusta → ĝustan
So both words show the same grammatical role:
- ĝustan respondon
What does klarigas mean, and why does it end in -as?
Klarigas is the present-tense verb form.
- klarigi = to explain, to make clear
- -as = present tense
So:
- klarigas = explains / is explaining
In Esperanto, all present-tense verbs end in -as, regardless of the subject:
- mi klarigas = I explain
- vi klarigas = you explain
- ŝi klarigas = she explains
There is no verb change like English explain/explains.
Why are there two verbs, klarigas and montras, with only one subject?
This is completely normal. One subject can do multiple actions.
Here the subject is la instruistino, and she does two things:
- klarigas la eraron
- montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo
They are joined by kaj, which means and.
So the structure is:
- The teacher explains the mistake and shows the correct answer on the board.
What does kaj do in this sentence?
Kaj means and. It connects the two verb phrases:
- klarigas la eraron
- montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo
So kaj tells you the same person is performing both actions.
What does sur la tabulo mean exactly?
Sur la tabulo means on the board.
- sur = on
- la tabulo = the board
So the phrase tells you where the correct answer is being shown.
In a classroom context, tabulo usually means a board for writing, such as a blackboard or whiteboard.
Why is there no -n on tabulo?
Because tabulo is not the direct object here. It is part of a prepositional phrase:
- sur la tabulo = on the board
Prepositions like sur normally take a noun without -n.
So:
- montras la ĝustan respondon → direct object, so respondon
- sur la tabulo → location after a preposition, so tabulo
A learner may later meet cases where -n appears after a preposition to show movement toward something, but that is not what is happening here.
Could the word order be changed?
Yes, Esperanto word order is fairly flexible because the -n ending helps show grammatical roles.
The normal order here is very natural:
- La instruistino klarigas la eraron kaj montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo.
But some variations are still understandable, for example:
- La eraron la instruistino klarigas.
- La ĝustan respondon la instruistino montras sur la tabulo.
Even so, beginners should usually prefer the straightforward order: subject + verb + object.
Why isn’t there a separate word for she?
Because the subject noun is already stated: la instruistino.
Once the sentence names the subject, Esperanto does not need a pronoun. English works the same way:
- The teacher explains... not
- The teacher she explains...
If you wanted to replace the noun with a pronoun, you could say:
- Ŝi klarigas la eraron kaj montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo. = She explains the mistake and shows the correct answer on the board.
Is klarigi literally “to make clear”?
Yes, that is a helpful way to understand it.
- klara = clear
- klarigi = to make clear, to explain
The ending -ig- often gives the idea to cause/make someone or something become something.
So klarigi is built very logically:
- clear → make clear → explain
This kind of word-building is very common in Esperanto.
What is the basic structure of the whole sentence?
A useful breakdown is:
- La instruistino = subject
- klarigas = first verb
- la eraron = first direct object
- kaj = and
- montras = second verb
- la ĝustan respondon = second direct object
- sur la tabulo = location phrase
So the pattern is:
subject + verb + object + and + verb + object + place
This is a very common and natural sentence pattern in Esperanto.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning EsperantoMaster Esperanto — from La instruistino klarigas la eraron kaj montras la ĝustan respondon sur la tabulo to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions