Breakdown of Mi portos la bluan ĉemizon, sed mi ankoraŭ admiras la flavajn florojn en la ĝardeno.
mi
I
la
the
floro
the flower
en
in
ĝardeno
the garden
sed
but
ankoraŭ
still
porti
to wear
blua
blue
flava
yellow
ĉemizo
the shirt
admiri
to admire
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Esperanto grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Mi portos la bluan ĉemizon, sed mi ankoraŭ admiras la flavajn florojn en la ĝardeno.
What does the -os ending in "portos" signify, and how is the future tense formed in Esperanto?
In Esperanto, the verb ending -os indicates the future tense. The future is formed by taking the verb stem (from the infinitive, which typically ends in -i) and appending -os. In this sentence, "portos" means "will carry" (or "will wear"), paralleling the English use of "will" to denote future actions.
Why do "ĉemizon" and "florojn" (as well as their adjectives "bluan" and "flavajn") end with -n?
In Esperanto, the -n ending marks the accusative case, which is used for the direct object of a verb. Here, both "ĉemizon" (jacket) and "florojn" (flowers) are objects—of "portos" and "admiras" respectively. Additionally, adjectives modifying accusative nouns must also receive the -n ending, so "blua" becomes "bluan" and "flava" becomes "flavajn" to agree with their nouns.
How do adjectives agree with nouns in Esperanto, as observed with "bluan" and "flavajn"?
Adjectives in Esperanto must agree with the nouns they describe in both number and case. Since the nouns "ĉemizon" and "florojn" are in the accusative case (marked by -n), their adjectives "blua" and "flava" must also carry the -n ending, resulting in "bluan" and "flavajn." This agreement ensures that modifiers clearly relate to the proper nouns.
What does the adverb "ankoraŭ" mean, and what is its role in this sentence?
"Ankoraŭ" means "still" in English. In the sentence, it functions as an adverb modifying "admiras," suggesting that even though a future action is planned (carrying the jacket), the speaker continues to admire the flowers in the present. It helps to contrast the future intention with the ongoing current state.
Why does the sentence use two different tenses—future for "portos" and present for "admiras"?
The sentence deliberately contrasts actions occurring in different time frames. "Portos" is in the future tense, indicating a planned action ("I will carry the blue jacket"), while "admiras" is in the present tense, reflecting an ongoing action ("I admire the yellow flowers"). This mix of tenses emphasizes that although a future act is anticipated, the current sentiment remains unchanged.
What is the function of the conjunction "sed" in this sentence?
"Sed" translates to "but" in English and serves as a coordinating conjunction. It introduces a contrast between the two clauses: the first clause communicates a future action ("I will carry the blue jacket"), and the second clause presents an ongoing sentiment ("I still admire the yellow flowers"). This contrast highlights the coexistence of planning and present feeling.