Mi sentas min feliĉa kiam mi legas libron.

I feel happy when I read a book.

Breakdown of Mi sentas min feliĉa kiam mi legas libron.

• mi: I
• libro: the book
• kiam: when
• min: me
• feliĉa: happy
• senti: to feel
• legi: to read

Questions & Answers about Mi sentas min feliĉa kiam mi legas libron.

Why is the pronoun min used in this sentence instead of the reflexive pronoun si?

In Esperanto, si is a special reflexive pronoun reserved for third-person subjects, where the subject and the object refer to the same entity (e.g., “Li sentas sin feliĉa”). Since the subject here is first person (mi), the correct object form is min. Even though the action is reflexive, you use min when the subject is mi.

How does the adjective feliĉa function in this sentence?

Feliĉa serves as a predicate adjective describing the state of the object (which, in this reflexive construction, refers back to the subject). Unlike adjectives that directly modify a noun in a noun phrase (where they would receive the accusative ending if the noun is in the accusative), predicate adjectives do not take the -n ending. Thus, feliĉa remains in its base form.

What does the -n ending in libron indicate?

In Esperanto, the -n ending marks the accusative case, which identifies the direct object of a verb. Since libro (book) is the object of legas (reads), it becomes libron to clearly indicate its grammatical role in the sentence.

What is the role of kiam in the sentence?

Kiam means “when” and introduces the subordinate clause “mi legas libron.” This clause specifies the condition or the time during which the main action (feeling happy) occurs, linking the cause or circumstance with the result.

Why can’t I just say “Mi sentas feliĉan” without using min as in the original sentence?

Using min is necessary to show that the subject is both the experiencer and the receiver of the feeling. In the construction “Mi sentas min feliĉa,” min clearly identifies the reflexive object, and feliĉa serves as a predicate adjective that describes that object. Omitting min (or replacing it with an accusative adjective form like feliĉan) would misrepresent the structure. It could suggest that feliĉa is the direct object itself rather than a description of one’s state.