Breakdown of We voerden het plan uit, hoewel het tijdrovend was.
Questions & Answers about We voerden het plan uit, hoewel het tijdrovend was.
Why is the separable verb uitvoeren split into voerden … uit in the main clause?
Why is the simple past (imperfectum) used here instead of the present perfect (perfectum)?
Why does the finite verb was appear at the end of the clause hoewel het tijdrovend was?
What’s the difference between hoewel and alhoewel?
Can I replace hoewel with ondanks?
Ondanks is a preposition, not a conjunction. You cannot say Ondanks het tijdrovend was. You can use:
- Ondanks dat het tijdrovend was, voerden we het plan uit. (preposition + dat
- subordinate clause)
- Ondanks het tijdrovende karakter, voerden we het plan uit. (preposition + noun phrase)
Is the comma before hoewel mandatory?
Can I move the hoewel clause to the front of the sentence?
Yes. Fronting the subordinate clause is fine:
Hoewel het tijdrovend was, voerden we het plan uit.
After the comma, you start the main clause anew; the finite verb (voerden) then occupies the first or second position in that main clause, depending on how you count the subordinate clause as a unit.
Could I use is instead of was in the hoewel clause?
Yes—if you want to indicate that it remains time-consuming now.
We voerden het plan uit, hoewel het tijdrovend is.
Use was when you refer strictly to the past event, is if the quality continues in the present.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from We voerden het plan uit, hoewel het tijdrovend was to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions