Breakdown of Veel mensen vinden geschiedenis belangrijk om het heden te begrijpen.
belangrijk
important
om
for
vinden
to find
begrijpen
to understand
veel
many
de geschiedenis
the history
de mens
the person
het heden
the present
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Dutch grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Veel mensen vinden geschiedenis belangrijk om het heden te begrijpen.
What is the role of the om … te clause in this sentence?
The om … te construction expresses purpose. In this sentence, om het heden te begrijpen means “in order to understand the present,” explaining why many people consider history important.
Why does the noun geschiedenis appear without an article?
In Dutch, general concepts like geschiedenis (“history”) are often used without an article to keep the statement broad and abstract. This is similar to English when we say “history is important” rather than “the history is important.”
How is the verb vinden used in this context?
Vinden means “to find” or “to consider.” Here, it functions as a linking verb that connects the subject (veel mensen) with the evaluation of history as important. It is similar to saying “many people consider history important.”
What function does the adjective belangrijk serve, and why is it placed after geschiedenis?
The adjective belangrijk (“important”) acts as an evaluative complement for geschiedenis. In Dutch, when expressing a judgment or opinion, it is common to place the adjective after the noun. This order emphasizes the quality attributed to history, much like in the English expression “find history important.”
Why is the definite article het used before heden?
The article het is necessary because heden (“the present”) is a neuter singular noun that requires a definite article in Dutch. It functions similarly to “the present” in English by signaling a specific time frame.
How does the word order of this sentence compare with its English translation?
The overall word order is similar to English: there is a subject (veel mensen/“many people”), a main verb (vinden/“find or consider”), an object (geschiedenis/“history”), and a purpose clause (om het heden te begrijpen/“in order to understand the present”). Despite minor differences in placement—such as the use of the om … te construction—the structure remains quite logical and comparable to the English sentence.
What nuance does vinden have compared to English verbs like “think” or “believe”?
While vinden can often be literally translated as “to find,” in Dutch it primarily conveys a sense of judgment or evaluation. It is used to express the opinion that “history is important,” whereas English might use “think” or “believe” in similar contexts. The choice of vinden underscores that the opinion is based on a considered judgment.
Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io
You've reached your AI usage limit
Sign up to increase your limit.