Wij reizen in februari.

Yes. Wij and we both mean we.

• we is the more common unstressed form in everyday speech.
• wij is the stressed or more emphatic form.

So both of these are correct:

• Wij reizen in februari.
• We reizen in februari.

Using wij can sound a little more deliberate or contrastive, like we as opposed to someone else.

Because wij takes the plural present-tense form of the verb.

The verb is reizen = to travel.
In the present tense:

• ik reis = I travel
• jij reist = you travel
• hij/zij reist = he/she travels
• wij reizen = we travel
• jullie reizen = you all travel
• zij reizen = they travel

So wij reizen is the correct match.

Grammatically, it is present tense, but it often has a future meaning.

Dutch, like English, often uses the present tense when a future time is already clear from the sentence. Here, in februari makes the future time obvious.

So Wij reizen in februari means something like:

• We travel in February
• We are travelling in February
• We will travel in February

All of those are possible English translations depending on context.

Dutch normally uses in with months.

Examples:

• in januari = in January
• in februari = in February
• in maart = in March

So in februari is the normal way to say in February.

Because Dutch month names usually appear without an article, just like in English.

So you say:

• in februari
• in april
• in december

Not:

• in de februari ❌

Also, month names are normally not capitalized in Dutch unless they start the sentence. So it is februari, not Februari.

In a normal Dutch main clause, the finite verb usually comes in the second position.

Here the order is:

• Wij = subject
• reizen = finite verb
• in februari = time expression

So the pattern is:

subject + verb + rest

You can also move the time phrase to the front:

• In februari reizen wij.
• In februari reizen we.

When that happens, the verb still stays in second position.

A simple approximation is:

• wij ≈ why
• reizen ≈ RYE-zuh(n)

A few notes:

• The Dutch ij sound is often close to the vowel in English find or why, though it is not exactly the same.
• The z in reizen is voiced, like z in zoo.
• The final -en is often pronounced weakly in everyday speech.

So a learner-friendly pronunciation of the whole sentence is roughly:

vay/why RYE-zuh(n) in fay-bruh-RAIR-ee

The exact sound depends on accent, especially for wij and the Dutch r.

Usually, yes. Reizen means to travel in a general sense.

It is a broad verb, so it can refer to going on a trip, travelling somewhere, or travelling in general.

For example:

• Wij reizen veel. = We travel a lot.
• Zij reizen naar België. = They travel to Belgium.

Dutch can also use other travel expressions, such as:

• op reis gaan = to go on a trip
• vertrekken = to depart
• naar ... gaan = to go to ...

But in this sentence, reizen is perfectly natural.

Normally, no. In a sentence like this, Dutch usually requires the subject to be stated.

So you say:

• Wij reizen in februari.
• We reizen in februari.

Not just:

• Reizen in februari. ❌

Dutch is not a language that regularly drops subject pronouns in ordinary statements.

Yes, that is possible, but it is less simple and often less natural than We reizen in februari.

Dutch often prefers the plain present tense when the future time is already clear:

• We reizen in februari. = very natural

You can also use gaan to make the future more explicit:

• We gaan in februari reizen.

That is grammatical, but in many contexts the shorter version sounds more natural.