Breakdown of Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast.
Questions & Answers about Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast.
Why is vast separated from leggen and placed at the end of the sentence?
Because vastleggen is a separable verb in Dutch.
- The full infinitive is vastleggen = to determine, to fix, to lay down formally
- In a main clause, Dutch usually splits separable verbs:
- Wij leggen ... vast.
- In the infinitive or in some other structures, the parts stay together:
- Wij willen de arbeidsplaats vastleggen.
- Omdat wij de arbeidsplaats vastleggen.
So leggen ... vast is not just lay ... fixed word-for-word; it is the normal split form of the verb vastleggen.
Does leggen by itself mean the same thing as vastleggen?
No. Leggen and vastleggen are different verbs.
- leggen usually means to lay, to put, or to place
- vastleggen means to fix, to establish, to determine, or to record formally
So in this sentence, you should understand the verb as vastleggen, not just leggen.
Examples:
- Ik leg het boek op tafel. = I put the book on the table.
- Wij leggen de datum vast. = We set/fix the date.
What does arbeidsplaats mean here?
Arbeidsplaats literally means something like place of work or workplace.
In this kind of formal or HR-related sentence, it usually refers to:
- the employee’s workplace
- the work location
- sometimes the official place where the employee will work
A more everyday Dutch word is often werkplek, but arbeidsplaats sounds more formal and administrative.
What does ingangsdatum mean exactly?
Ingangsdatum is a formal word meaning the start date or effective date.
It is often used for:
- contracts
- employment
- legal documents
- policies or agreements
So in this sentence, it most likely means the date on which the job or agreement officially begins.
Why do both nouns have de: de arbeidsplaats and de ingangsdatum?
Because both nouns are de-words in Dutch, and each noun phrase normally takes its own article.
So:
- de arbeidsplaats
- de ingangsdatum
Dutch often repeats the article when linking two separate nouns with en:
- de man en de vrouw
- het contract en de voorwaarden
- de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum
This is very natural and standard.
Can you say Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en ingangsdatum vast without the second de?
Usually, the full version with both articles is better and more natural here:
- Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast.
Leaving out the second article is sometimes possible in certain coordinated expressions, but in a formal sentence like this, repeating de sounds clearer and more standard.
So for learners, it is best to keep:
- de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum
Why is it wij leggen and not wij legt?
Because wij means we, and the verb must agree with the subject.
The present tense of leggen is:
So with wij, the correct form is leggen.
Is wij the same as English we, or can it also mean something else?
Here it simply means we.
In Dutch, wij and we both mean we:
- wij is the fuller, more stressed form
- we is the unstressed, very common everyday form
So this sentence could also be:
- We leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast.
Both are correct. Wij may sound slightly more formal or emphatic.
What kind of sentence is this in terms of word order?
This is a normal main clause in Dutch.
The basic pattern is:
- Subject: Wij
- Finite verb: leggen
- Object(s): de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum
- Separable prefix: vast
So the structure is:
- Wij | leggen | de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum | vast
This is typical Dutch word order with separable verbs in a main clause.
What would happen to the word order in a subordinate clause?
In a subordinate clause, the separable verb usually becomes one whole verb again and moves toward the end.
- Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast.
Subordinate clause:
- ..., omdat wij de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vastleggen.
So:
- main clause: leggen ... vast
- subordinate clause: vastleggen
This is an important pattern in Dutch.
Is vastleggen always formal?
It is often a bit more formal than everyday English set or decide, but it is very common and useful.
Depending on context, vastleggen can mean:
- to determine
- to set
- to establish
- to record
- to formalize
Examples:
- We leggen de afspraak vast. = We record/formalize the agreement.
- Ze leggen de datum vast. = They set the date.
- De regels zijn vastgelegd. = The rules have been laid down / established.
In your sentence, it has a formal, administrative tone.
How would a yes/no question be formed from this sentence?
In Dutch yes/no questions, the verb usually comes first.
Statement:
- Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast.
Question:
- Leggen wij de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast?
This means:
- Are we determining the workplace and the start date?
- or Do we determine the workplace and the start date?
The separable part vast still stays at the end in the main clause question.
Is this something people would actually say, or is it mainly administrative language?
It sounds mostly formal and administrative, especially because of:
- arbeidsplaats
- ingangsdatum
- vastleggen
You are likely to see this in:
- contracts
- HR documents
- onboarding materials
- official emails
In more everyday Dutch, people might use simpler wording such as:
- We spreken de werkplek en de startdatum af.
- We bepalen de werkplek en de startdatum.
But the original sentence is perfectly correct and natural in a formal context.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DutchMaster Dutch — from Wij leggen de arbeidsplaats en de ingangsdatum vast to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions