Co se týče hospitalizace, léčebné výlohy nejsou nízké.

Co se týče means as for, regarding, when it comes to, or as far as ... is concerned.

It is a very common Czech expression for introducing a topic:

• Co se týče hospitalizace, ... = As for hospitalization, ...
• Co se týče ceny, ... = As for the price, ...
• Co se týče počasí, ... = As for the weather, ...

It is best learned as a fixed phrase. Literally, it is connected with the verb týkat se (to concern / to relate to).

After co se týče, Czech normally uses the genitive case.

So the pattern is:

• co se týče + genitive

In this sentence, hospitalizace is in the genitive singular. The tricky part is that for this noun, the nominative and genitive singular look the same:

• nominative: hospitalizace
• genitive: hospitalizace

So even though the form does not change visibly, it is still functioning as a genitive.

The se is part of the verb pattern. The full verb is týkat se (to concern, to pertain to), and týče is the 3rd person singular form.

So:

• týkat se něčeho = to concern something / to relate to something

In co se týče, you should treat the whole expression as a fixed unit. The se is not optional here.

Hospitalizace means hospitalization or being admitted to / staying in a hospital.

It is a formal noun, similar in tone to English hospitalization. In everyday speech, Czech speakers might sometimes express the idea more simply depending on context, for example with wording related to pobyt v nemocnici (a stay in hospital).

So in this sentence, it refers specifically to the topic of hospital treatment requiring hospital admission.

Léčebné výlohy means medical expenses, treatment expenses, or costs of treatment.

Breakdown:

• léčebné = relating to treatment / therapeutic / medical-treatment-related
• výlohy = expenses, costs

This phrase sounds rather formal or administrative, and it fits especially well in insurance, legal, or official contexts.

Yes, that is a very reasonable question, because výloha very commonly means shop window / display window.

But výlohy can also mean expenses. In that meaning, it is usually encountered in more formal or older-sounding language, especially in legal, bureaucratic, or insurance contexts.

So here:

• léčebné výlohy = medical expenses

In more everyday modern Czech, many speakers would more naturally say:

• náklady na léčbu = costs of treatment
• léčebné náklady = treatment costs
• výdaje na léčbu = expenses for treatment

So the sentence is understandable and correct, but the vocabulary is somewhat formal.

Because léčebné has to agree with výlohy.

Here, výlohy is:

• plural
• feminine
• nominative (because it is the subject of the sentence)

So the adjective must also be:

• plural
• feminine/inanimate plural form in the nominative

That gives:

• léčebné výlohy

This is standard adjective-noun agreement in Czech.

Both are possible, but they are not exactly identical in tone.

• nejsou nízké = are not low
• jsou vysoké = are high

Using nejsou nízké can sound a little more cautious, understated, or formal. It is similar to English when someone says the costs are not low rather than the costs are high.

So the sentence may sound a bit less direct or slightly more diplomatic than Léčebné výlohy jsou vysoké.

Because it describes výlohy, which is plural.

So again, the adjective agrees with the noun:

• výlohy = plural
• therefore nízké = plural

You can compare:

• výloha je nízká = the expense / display window is low (singular, feminine)
• výlohy jsou nízké = the expenses are low (plural)

In this sentence:

• léčebné výlohy nejsou nízké = medical expenses are not low

The phrase Co se týče hospitalizace is an introductory topic-setting expression, so it is separated by a comma from the main clause.

Structure:

• Co se týče hospitalizace, = topic frame / introductory phrase
• léčebné výlohy nejsou nízké. = main statement

This is similar to English punctuation in sentences like:

• As for hospitalization, medical expenses are not low.

Not completely. Czech word order is flexible, but the original order is natural and clear.

The given sentence:

• Co se týče hospitalizace, léčebné výlohy nejsou nízké.

This works well because it first introduces the topic, then makes the comment.

You could rearrange parts in Czech, but the result may sound less neutral or shift emphasis. For example:

• Léčebné výlohy, co se týče hospitalizace, nejsou nízké.

This is possible, but less straightforward and not the most natural neutral wording.

So the original word order is a good standard choice.

It is grammatical and understandable, but it sounds rather formal, and some speakers might choose more common vocabulary.

A more everyday or modern version might be:

• Co se týče hospitalizace, náklady na léčbu nejsou nízké.
• Pokud jde o hospitalizaci, náklady na léčbu nejsou nízké.

If you want a more direct version:

• Náklady na hospitalizaci jsou vysoké.
• Hospitalizace není levná.

So the original sentence is fine, especially in an official or written context, but it is not especially conversational.

They are very close in meaning.

• co se týče = as for / regarding
• pokud jde o = as for / when it comes to / concerning

Both are common, but pokud jde o can feel a little more neutral or modern in some contexts, while co se týče is also very standard and widely used.

Examples:

• Co se týče hospitalizace, ...
• Pokud jde o hospitalizaci, ...

Both are correct. In many situations, they are interchangeable.

Yes, that is a subtle but good observation.

The sentence literally sets hospitalization as the topic, then says treatment expenses are not low. So the wording is slightly broader than just hospitalization costs.

Depending on context, it may mean:

• the expenses connected with hospitalization, or
• more generally, treatment costs in cases involving hospitalization

If you wanted to express the idea more precisely, Czech might say:

• Náklady na hospitalizaci nejsou nízké. = The costs of hospitalization are not low.
• Výlohy spojené s hospitalizací nejsou nízké. = The expenses connected with hospitalization are not low.

So yes, the original wording is acceptable, but it is not the most tightly specific phrasing possible.