Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Croatian: Dugujem novac za vozilo. - I owe money for the vehicle.

Hardcore Croatian
/Setting up an ergonomic home office
/Dugujem novac za vozilo.

Dugujem novac za vozilo.

Word

Dugujem novac za vozilo.

Meaning

I owe money for the vehicle.

Part of speech

sentence

Pronunciation

Course

Hardcore Croatian

Lesson

Setting up an ergonomic home office

Breakdown of Dugujem novac za vozilo.

Questions & Answers about Dugujem novac za vozilo.

Why isn’t ja included in the sentence?

Croatian often leaves out subject pronouns because the verb ending already tells you who the subject is.

dugujem = I owe
The ending -em shows 1st person singular

So Dugujem novac za vozilo already means I owe money for the vehicle. You would add ja only for emphasis or contrast:

Ja dugujem novac za vozilo, ne on. = I owe money for the vehicle, not him.

What form is dugujem?

Dugujem is the 1st person singular present tense of the verb dugovati.

So:

dugujem = I owe
duguješ = you owe
duguje = he/she/it owes

In English, this can often be translated simply as I owe. Croatian present tense does not work exactly like English tense usage, but here the meaning is straightforward.

Why is there no word for a or the?

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Croatian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Croatian now

Croatian does not have articles like English a/an/the.

So:

novac can mean money / the money
vozilo can mean a vehicle / the vehicle

You understand whether it is definite or indefinite from context, not from an article.

What case is novac, and why does it stay novac?

Here novac is the direct object of dugujem, so it is in the accusative singular.

The reason it looks unchanged is that novac is a masculine inanimate noun, and for many masculine inanimate nouns:

nominative singular = accusative singular

So:

nominative: novac
accusative: novac

That is completely normal.

Why is it novac and not novci or novce?

Novac is the standard general word for money as a mass noun, similar to English money.

novac = money in general
novci can mean coins
novce is very common in everyday speech in some varieties, especially conversational Croatian, as a way of saying money

So Dugujem novac za vozilo is standard and natural. In casual speech, you may also hear Dugujem novce za vozilo.

Why is za used here?

Za here means for in the sense of in connection with payment or debt.

So novac za vozilo means:

money for the vehicle
money intended to pay for the vehicle
money owed in relation to the vehicle

This is a very normal use of za in Croatian.

What case does vozilo have after za?

Here za takes the accusative.

So vozilo is in the accusative singular.

The tricky part is that vozilo is a neuter noun, and for many neuter nouns:

nominative singular = accusative singular

So:

nominative: vozilo
accusative: vozilo

That is why the form does not change.

Does vozilo mean specifically car?

Not necessarily. Vozilo means vehicle, so it is a broader word.

It could refer to:

a car
a van
a truck
some other vehicle

If you specifically mean car, Croatian speakers would often use:

auto
automobil

So if the intended meaning is specifically car, Dugujem novac za auto may sound more everyday and natural.

Can I replace vozilo with auto or automobil?

Yes.

vozilo = vehicle, broader and a bit more formal/neutral
auto = car, very common in everyday speech
automobil = car, a bit more formal than auto

Examples:

Dugujem novac za vozilo. = I owe money for the vehicle.
Dugujem novac za auto. = I owe money for the car.
Dugujem novac za automobil. = I owe money for the automobile/car.

How would I say who I owe the money to?

You add that person or institution in the dative case.

Examples:

Dugujem banci novac za vozilo. = I owe the bank money for the vehicle.
Dugujem mu novac za vozilo. = I owe him money for the vehicle.
Dugujem joj novac za vozilo. = I owe her money for the vehicle.

So the pattern is often:

dugovati + someone in dative + thing owed

Can I leave out novac and just say Dugujem za vozilo?

Sometimes in conversation, yes, if the context makes it obvious that you mean money. But Dugujem novac za vozilo is clearer and more complete.

So:

Dugujem novac za vozilo. = explicit and clear
Dugujem za vozilo. = possible in context, but less explicit

For learners, it is safer to use the fuller version first.

Is the word order fixed?

No. Croatian word order is fairly flexible, although Dugujem novac za vozilo is the most neutral order.

You can move parts around for emphasis, for example:

Za vozilo dugujem novac. = emphasis on for the vehicle
Novac za vozilo dugujem banci. = emphasis on the money for the vehicle

But the neutral, natural starting point for learners is:

Dugujem novac za vozilo.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io