miànshìguān yě wèn le wǒ de yōushì hé quēdiǎn.

面试官 means interviewer.

It is made of:

• 面试 = interview
• 官 = officer / official / person in a role

So 面试官 is the person who conducts the interview.

也 means also.

In Chinese, words like 也 usually go before the verb, not later in the sentence as in English.

So:

• 面试官也问了... = The interviewer also asked...

A very common pattern is:

• Subject + 也 + Verb + Object

Examples:

• 我也去。 = I’m going too.
• 他也喜欢中文。 = He also likes Chinese.

Here, 了 marks that the action happened or was completed.

So 问了 means asked.

It does not always mean past tense in the same way English does, but in this sentence it shows the asking took place as a completed event.

Compare:

• 面试官问我的优势和缺点。 = The interviewer asks / asked about my strengths and weaknesses.
  
  • More neutral, less clearly marked as completed.
• 面试官问了我的优势和缺点。 = The interviewer asked about my strengths and weaknesses.
  
  • Clearly indicates the asking happened.

的 is a very common particle used to show possession or modification.

So:

• 我 = I / me
• 我的 = my
• 我的优势 = my strengths

In this sentence, 我的 applies to both 优势 and 缺点, so the phrase means:

• my strengths and weaknesses

Chinese often does this:

• 我的书和笔 = my book and pen
  
  • not 我的书和我的笔, unless you want extra emphasis

It applies to both.

So 我的优势和缺点 means:

• my strengths and weaknesses

Chinese often lets one modifier cover two nouns joined by 和.

If you expanded it fully, it would be:

• 我的优势和我的缺点

But that sounds less natural unless you want special emphasis.

Good question. Chinese often allows 问 to take the topic asked about directly.

So:

• 问了我的优势和缺点 = asked about my strengths and weaknesses

Even though English usually says asked me about..., Chinese does not always need to include the person being asked if the topic is clear.

You could say other versions, such as:

• 面试官也问了我我的优势和缺点。
• 面试官也问了我关于我的优势和缺点。

But these are usually less natural or more wordy in this context.

So the given sentence is a very natural Chinese way to say it.

Both are positive words, but they are not exactly the same.

• 优势 = strengths / advantages
  
  • often used in a more comparative or strategic sense
  • what gives someone an edge
• 优点 = good points / merits
  
  • more general everyday word

In a job interview, 优势 sounds especially appropriate because interviewers often ask what your competitive strengths are.

For example:

• 我的优势是沟通能力强。 = My strength is strong communication skills.
• 他的优点是很认真。 = His good point is that he is very conscientious.

Both can relate to weaknesses, but they are a little different.

• 缺点 = shortcomings, flaws, weak points
  
  • very common in interview/self-evaluation language
• 弱点 = weak spot, vulnerability
  
  • often sounds stronger, or like an area where someone can be attacked or exposed

In interview contexts, 优点和缺点 or 优势和缺点 is very common and natural.

So 缺点 is the safer and more standard choice here.

Yes. A common shorter expression is:

• 优缺点

So you could say:

• 面试官也问了我的优缺点。

This means the same thing and sounds very natural.

Yes. In this sentence, 和 as and is pronounced hé.

So:

• 优势和缺点 = yōushì hé quēdiǎn

You may hear other pronunciations of 和 in different words or regional speech, but for learners, using hé for and is correct and standard.

The structure is:

• 面试官 / 也 / 问了 / 我的优势和缺点
• Subject / also / asked / my strengths and weaknesses

So the pattern is roughly:

• Subject + 也 + Verb + Object

This is very typical Chinese word order.

In English, that sounds unnatural. English normally says:

• asked about my strengths and weaknesses
• or asked me about my strengths and weaknesses

But in Chinese, 问 can directly take the topic, so 问了我的优势和缺点 is completely natural.

This is one of those places where Chinese and English package the idea differently.

It is neutral and natural, and it fits especially well in contexts like:

• talking about a job interview
• writing about interview experience
• describing what happened during an interview

The vocabulary is slightly formal because words like 面试官, 优势, and 缺点 are common in professional settings, but the sentence itself is straightforward and not overly formal.