فريقنا يفوز، ويحمل صديقي وشاحه.

These are attached possessive pronouns.

• فريقنا = team + our = our team
• صديقي = friend + my = my friend
• وشاحه = scarf + his = his scarf

This is a very common Arabic pattern. Instead of using a separate word for my, our, or his, Arabic often attaches the pronoun directly to the noun.

Common suffixes here:

• -نا = our
• -ي / -يْ = my
• -ه = his

Because a noun becomes definite when it is possessed.

So:

• فريقنا already means our team, which is definite
• وشاحه already means his scarf, which is also definite

In Arabic, you normally do not combine ال with these attached possessive suffixes. So الفريقنا and الوشاحه would be wrong.

Because فريق is grammatically a singular masculine noun in Arabic.

Even though a team is made up of many people, the word فريق itself is singular, so the verb agrees with the word, not with the real-world number of people inside the group.

That is why Arabic uses:

• فريقنا يفوز = literally our team wins

not a plural verb.

Arabic allows both patterns:

• Subject + Verb: فريقنا يفوز
• Verb + Subject: يحمل صديقي وشاحه

Both are normal.

A simple way to think about it:

• فريقنا يفوز puts a little more attention on our team
• يحمل صديقي وشاحه starts with the action, so it feels more verbal and event-focused

In MSA, verb-first order is very common, but subject-first is also very common. Native speakers and writers switch between them for style, rhythm, and emphasis.

Both are in the imperfect form, which often corresponds to the present tense in English.

So here they can mean something like:

• wins / is winning
• carries / is carrying

In context, the imperfect can also express a habitual action, not only something happening right now.

Without a future marker such as سـ or سوف, the default reading here is present or habitual, not future.

صديقي contains the suffix -ي meaning my.

Because of that suffix, the noun’s case ending is not clearly visible in the normal written form. Even though صديقي is the subject of يحمل, and therefore nominative, you do not see a separate final ـُ the way you would with a noun that has no suffix.

So grammatically it is nominative, but its ending is essentially hidden by the attached pronoun.

A fully vowelled version would look like this:

فريقُنا يفوزُ، ويحملُ صديقي وشاحَهُ.

Here is what those endings show:

• فريقُنا: nominative, because it is the subject
• يفوزُ: indicative imperfect
• يحملُ: indicative imperfect
• صديقي: nominative as the subject of يحمل, though the case is not visibly separate because of -ي
• وشاحَهُ: accusative, because it is the direct object of يحمل

In ordinary unvowelled Arabic text, most of these short vowels are simply not written.

Because يحمل takes a direct object in Arabic.

So:

• يحمل صديقي وشاحه = my friend carries his scarf

Arabic does not need a separate object marker here. The object relationship is shown by the sentence structure, and in fully vowelled Arabic it would also be shown by the accusative ending on وشاحه.

The و means and.

In Arabic, short particles like و are usually written attached to the following word, not separated by a space.

So:

• ويحمل = and he carries / and carries

This is completely normal Arabic spelling.

Usually, that is the most natural interpretation: his scarf = my friend’s scarf.

But grammatically, -ه can refer to another earlier masculine singular noun if the context supports it. Since فريق is also grammatically masculine singular, the suffix could in theory refer back to فريق.

So the exact reference is determined by context, just as English his can sometimes be ambiguous.

Because Arabic uses its own punctuation style, and the comma is written as ،.

It functions like a comma in English, but its shape is different. In Arabic text, this is the normal comma to use.