Le forgeron n'a pas pu forger l'acier, faute de charbon.

Questions & Answers about Le forgeron n'a pas pu forger l'acier, faute de charbon.

Why is there no article before charbon? Shouldn't it be faute du charbon?
The expression faute de (for lack of) is typically followed directly by a bare noun when referring to something general or uncountable. You just say faute de charbon (for lack of coal), exactly like faute de temps (for lack of time). If you said faute du charbon, it would mean for lack of the specific coal you were just discussing.
Could we use an infinitive after faute de in a sentence like this?
Yes! The phrase faute de can be followed by a noun or an infinitive verb. If the blacksmith failed because he lacked the action of finding coal, you would use the infinitive: faute de trouver du charbon (for lack of finding coal).
Why does this sentence use the passé composé (n'a pas pu) instead of the imparfait (ne pouvait pas) for 'could not'?
The passé composé (n'a pas pu) shows that this was a specific, isolated event where the blacksmith attempted a task and failed. If you used the imparfait (ne pouvait pas), it would sound like a general background description indicating that he lacked the ongoing ability to forge steel over a period of time.
I see forgeron (blacksmith) and forger (to forge). Is -eron a common suffix for professions?
While -eur (like vendeur) or -ier (like boulanger) are more common, -eron is a classic suffix used to turn a material or action into a profession. Another common example is bûcheron (lumberjack), related to bûche (log).

Learn Le forgeron n'a pas pu forger l'acier, faute de charbon and more in French

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free