Breakdown of Par contre, ce qui est amusant, c'est le sarcasme subtil.
être
to be
amusant
fun
c'est
it is, that is
ce qui
what (subject)
Questions & Answers about Par contre, ce qui est amusant, c'est le sarcasme subtil.
Why do we use ce qui in this sentence instead of ce que?
Why do we need c'est in the middle of the sentence? Doesn't ce qui est amusant already act as the subject?
Why is there a le before sarcasme subtil when the English translation just says "subtle sarcasm"?
In French, general concepts and abstract nouns (like sarcasm, love, or time) almost always require a definite article (le, la, or les). In English, we typically leave the article out when talking about these concepts generally.
Is par contre the only way to say "on the other hand"?