Tämä pykälä on sitova, kunhan hyväksymme sen.

Questions & Answers about Tämä pykälä on sitova, kunhan hyväksymme sen.

How does the word kunhan change the meaning compared to just using jos (if) or kun (when)?
While jos introduces a basic condition and kun deals with time, kunhan combines both into a strict prerequisite. It means "provided that" or "as long as". The enclitic particle -han attaches to kun to emphasize that the main clause (the clause being binding) relies entirely on this one specific expectation being met.
Is sitova an adjective or a verb here?
It functions as an adjective, but it is formed from the verb sitoa (to bind or tie). This is the present active participle, formed by adding the -va suffix to the verb's strong vowel stem. It describes what the noun is currently doing, translating smoothly to "binding".
Why is the object sen used here instead of the partitive sitä?
The verb hyväksyä (to accept) usually takes a total object when an action is seen as complete and final. Because we are talking about accepting the specific clause in its entirety, the object takes the genitive-looking accusative form sen. If the acceptance were an ongoing process, you would use the partitive sitä.
Why doesn't the verb hyväksymme take the conditional marker -isi- if this is a conditional sentence?
kunhan establishes the condition itself, so the verb usually stays in the simple present tense (indicative mood) if the condition is realistic and expected to happen. You would only use the conditional mood (hyväksyisimme) if the scenario was purely hypothetical or unlikely, translating closer to "This clause would be binding, provided that we accepted it".

Learn Tämä pykälä on sitova, kunhan hyväksymme sen and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free