Present Active Participle -va/-vä | Finnish Grammar

The present active participle ends in -va or -vä and turns a verb into an adjective meaning "…-ing" or "who/which …-s": puhuva "speaking, who speaks," itkevä "crying," tekevä "doing," syövä "eating." The single most important thing to understand up front is that it is not a tense. It does not translate the English progressive "I am speaking" — Finnish just says puhun for that. The -va participle is a full-blown adjective: it agrees with its noun, it declines through all the cases, and its main day job is to squeeze a whole relative clause down into one word.

How it is built: strong present stem + -va/-vä

Take the verb's present stem — the same stem the third person singular is built on — and add -va (after a back-vowel verb) or -vä (after a front-vowel verb). Because you build on the present stem, any consonant gradation shows up in the strong grade, exactly as it does in hän-forms.

Verb	Present stem	Participle	Meaning
puhua	puhu-	puhuva	speaking
juosta	juokse-	juokseva	running
itkeä	itke-	itkevä	crying
tehdä	teke-	tekevä	doing
syödä	syö-	syövä	eating
nukkua	nukku-	nukkuva	sleeping
tulla	tule-	tuleva	coming

Two traps hide in this table. First, harmony: puhuva has back vowels so it takes -va, but syövä has the front vowel ö, so it must be -vä. Second, gradation shows the strong grade: you say tekevä, never *teevä, and nukkuva, never *nukuva, because the participle is built on the strong stem teke-, nukku- — not on the weak stem you hear in teen, nukun.

Junassa oli itkevä vauva ja kaksi nukkuvaa vanhusta.

On the train there was a crying baby and two sleeping elderly people.

Pihalla on aina joku haukkuva koira.

There's always some barking dog in the yard.

Its main job: compressing a relative clause

This is where the -va participle earns its keep. Finnish, like English, can describe a noun with a full relative clause introduced by joka "who/which." But very often it prefers to collapse that clause into a single participle placed in front of the noun. Watch what happens to juna, joka lähtee "the train that is leaving":

Relative clause	Participle	English
juna, joka lähtee	lähtevä juna	the departing train
mies, joka juoksee	juokseva mies	the running man
lapsi, joka nukkuu	nukkuva lapsi	the sleeping child

The participle can only replace a joka-clause when joka is the subject of that clause ("the train that leaves," "the man who runs"). When the relative pronoun is an object or carries a case ("the train that I saw"), you must keep the full clause. This is the same limit English has: you can say "the departing train" but not "*the I-saw train."

Laiturilla seisoi lähtevää junaa odottava väkijoukko.

On the platform stood a crowd waiting for the departing train.

Ohi kiitävä juna oli niin nopea, etten ehtinyt lukea numeroa.

The train speeding past was so fast that I couldn't read the number.

💡

When you catch yourself building a "the X that does Y" clause in English, ask whether Y is simply what X does. If so, Finnish will usually front a single participle: the water that is boiling → kiehuva vesi. See the full picture on the relative clause page.

It is an adjective, so it agrees and declines

Because -va/-vä is adjectival, an attributive participle copies its noun's case and number exactly the way iso does in isossa talossa. This is the point English speakers forget, because English participles never inflect. When tuleva vuosi "the coming year" goes into the essive, both words take the ending:

Toivotan sinulle kaikkea hyvää tulevana vuonna.

I wish you all the best in the coming year.

Annoin karkkia itkevälle lapselle.

I gave sweets to the crying child.

Poliisi pysäytti ylinopeutta ajavan auton.

The police stopped the speeding car.

Here tulevana takes the essive ending -na to match vuonna; itkevälle takes the allative -lle to match lapselle; ajavan takes the genitive/accusative -n to match auton. Leave the participle bare (*tuleva vuonna) and the phrase is broken. In the plural it pluralises too: nukkuvat lapset "the sleeping children," nukkuvia lapsia "sleeping children" (partitive plural). The declension mechanics are covered fully on participles as adjectives.

Predicative use and the referatiivi preview

The -va participle can also stand after olla as a predicate adjective, especially once it has settled into the lexicon as an ordinary adjective: jännittävä "exciting," huolestuttava "worrying," vaativa "demanding."

Tämä uutinen on todella huolestuttavaa.

This news is really worrying.

The same -va form, fitted with a possessive suffix, powers the referatiivirakenne — the participial construction that replaces an että "that" clause for a same-time or future report: tuleva → tulevani "that I am coming/will come."

Sanoin tulevani heti töiden jälkeen.

I said I'd come right after work.

Hän väitti tietävänsä oikean vastauksen.

She claimed to know the right answer.

This is only a preview; the genitive subject, the possessive suffixes, and the tense contrast belong to the referatiivi construction, which gets its own full treatment.

💡

Do not confuse the -va participle with the passive -tava/-tävä. Syövä is a child who eats; syötävä is a mushroom that can be eaten. One points outward (the noun does the action), the other points inward (the action is done to the noun). See the present passive participle.

Common Mistakes

❌ Minä olen puhuva englantia.

Incorrect — this is not how you say 'I am speaking'; the present tense already does it: puhun.

✅ Minä puhun englantia.

I speak / I'm speaking English.

❌ Tapaan hänet tuleva viikolla.

Incorrect — the participle must copy the adessive of its noun: tulevalla viikolla.

✅ Tapaan hänet tulevalla viikolla.

I'll meet him next week.

❌ Pöydällä oli teevä äiti.

Incorrect — the participle keeps the strong stem teke-: the form is tekevä.

✅ Keittiössä oli ruokaa tekevä äiti.

In the kitchen there was a mother making food.

❌ Se oli syövä sieni.

Incorrect — 'an edible mushroom' is the passive syötävä; syövä means 'a mushroom that eats'.

✅ Se oli syötävä sieni.

It was an edible mushroom.

Key Takeaways

Formation: strong present stem + -va (back) / -vä (front): puhuva, syövä, tekevä (strong grade, never *teevä).
It is an adjective, not a tense — never use it to translate the English progressive (I am speaking = puhun, not *olen puhuva).
Its core use is compressing a relative clause whose joka is the subject: juna, joka lähtee → lähtevä juna.
Attributively it agrees in case and number: tulevana vuonna, itkevälle lapselle.
With a possessive suffix it feeds the referatiivi "that"-clause: Sanoin tulevani.

Now practice Finnish

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Finnish→