Breakdown of Hänen suorituksensa oli liian patsasmainen ja teatterimainen.
olla
to be
hän
he / she
ja
and
liian
too (excessively)
Questions & Answers about Hänen suorituksensa oli liian patsasmainen ja teatterimainen.
Is the -mainen suffix attached to the nominative form or the word stem of patsas?
It attaches directly to the nominative singular form of the noun, not the inflectional stem. Even though the stem of patsas (statue) changes to patsaa- when adding many other grammatical endings, for this suffix you simply use the basic dictionary form: patsas + -mainen = patsasmainen (statue-like).
Could I say teatraalinen instead of teatterimainen here?
Yes, teatraalinen is a very common loanword for theatrical and would fit perfectly to describe a dramatic or unnatural performance. Teatterimainen uses the native Finnish suffix to mean resembling a theater or theater-like, specifically emphasizing that the performance felt like a staged play.
Why does suorituksensa need the -nsa suffix when the sentence already specifies hänen?
In standard written Finnish, when you use a third-person possessive pronoun like hänen (his/her) or heidän (their), you are grammatically required to also add the matching possessive suffix to the noun itself. You cannot write just hänen suoritus. In everyday spoken Finnish, however, the suffix is often dropped in favor of just the pronoun.
Does suoritus exclusively mean an artistic performance like in a play?