Questions & Answers about Hän luki kirjaa, kun sain pihan haravoiduksi.
What exactly does the structure sain pihan haravoiduksi convey that a simple past tense like haravoin pihan does not?
This is the translative participle construction of achievement. While haravoin pihan simply means "I raked the yard", using sain (from saada) plus the translative participle haravoiduksi emphasizes getting something done or managing to finish a task. It highlights the successful completion of the effort.
How is the word haravoiduksi formed?
It comes from the verb haravoida (to rake). First, you form the passive past participle haravoitu (raked). To add the translative case ending -ksi, the stem changes to the weak consonant grade (the t becomes a d), resulting in haravoiduksi.
Why is the object pihan in the genitive-like accusative case here?
The construction saada + translative participle inherently expresses that a task was completely finished. Because the action of raking the yard was seen through to completion, its object (piha) takes the total object case, which for a singular noun is the genitive-looking accusative pihan.
Notice how kirjaa is in the partitive case but pihan is in the accusative case. Why is there a difference?