Breakdown of Muinainen sivilisaatio lienee kadonnut, ja tämä mysteeri kiinnostaa meitä.
tämä
this
olla
to be
ja
and
me
we
Questions & Answers about Muinainen sivilisaatio lienee kadonnut, ja tämä mysteeri kiinnostaa meitä.
How does the potential perfect lienee kadonnut work in this sentence?
It expresses that something probably happened in the past. It is formed using lienee, which is the third-person singular potential form of the auxiliary verb olla, plus the active past participle of the main verb, kadonnut. Together, they mean "probably disappeared" or "has likely disappeared".
Why does the verb kadota become kadonnut with a double N?
Kadota (to disappear) is a type 4 verb. When forming the active past participle for verb types 4, 5, and 6, the suffix is -nnut or -nnyt with a double N. You find the stem by dropping the infinitive ending -ta. So, kadota becomes the stem kado-, plus -nnut, resulting in kadonnut.
Why is the pronoun meitä in the partitive case here?
The verb kiinnostaa (to interest) describes an ongoing emotion or state. In Finnish, verbs that express continuous feelings or incomplete actions require their object to be in the partitive case. Therefore, "interests us" translates to kiinnostaa meitä.
How does tämä mysteeri kiinnostaa meitä differ from saying olemme kiinnostuneita tästä mysteeristä?