Onhan toisen laatikon muoto erilainen kuin toisen?

Questions & Answers about Onhan toisen laatikon muoto erilainen kuin toisen?

Why do we use the genitive form toisen twice in this sentence?
The phrase toinen ... toinen means "one ... the other". Both words take the case required by their role in the sentence. The first toisen is genitive because it possesses the box (toisen laatikon muoto, "the shape of one box"). The second one is also genitive because we are comparing the shape to that of the second box (kuin toisen, "than of the other").
Why does the sentence start with Onhan instead of just Onko?
Using the standard question clitic -ko (Onko...?) would make it a neutral yes/no question. Attaching the clitic -han instead turns the sentence into a question that expects the listener to agree, translating well to "The shape is different, isn't it?" or "Surely the shape is different?"
I thought kuin meant "than" for words like bigger or smaller. Why is it used with erilainen (different)?
In English you usually say "different from", but Finnish treats erilainen similarly to comparative adjectives like bigger or faster. Because of this, you always use kuin to make the comparison: erilainen kuin (different from).
Why isn't the word for box (laatikko) repeated at the end of the sentence?
Just like in English, you don't need to repeat the noun if the context is clear. Because the second pronoun is in the genitive case (toisen), it literally translates to "...than of the other", which perfectly implies "...than the shape of the other box" without needing to say laatikon muoto again.

Learn Onhan toisen laatikon muoto erilainen kuin toisen and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free