این عقیده‌ی شایع نادرست است؛ در حقیقت بسیار گمراه‌کننده است.

Questions & Answers about این عقیده‌ی شایع نادرست است؛ در حقیقت بسیار گمراه‌کننده است.

Why is dar haqiqat used here instead of a simple conjunction like "and"?
It acts as an escalating discourse marker. The speaker isn't just adding a second fact; they are taking the first statement ("it is incorrect") and raising the stakes to something stronger ("it is very misleading"). It works exactly like "as a matter of fact" or "in fact" in English when you want to emphasize or double-down on a point.
Could I swap dar haqiqat with dar vâqe' in this sentence?
Yes, absolutely. In this context of specifying or intensifying a claim, dar haqiqat (literally "in truth") and dar vâqe' (literally "in reality") are practically interchangeable. Both serve the function of adjusting or focusing the listener's perspective.
How is the word gomrâh-konande (misleading) built?
It is a compound adjective. It combines gomrâh (astray or lost) with konande, which is the active participle of kardan (to do/make). Literally meaning "maker of going astray," it is the standard Farsi equivalent for "misleading" or "deceptive."
Why use nâ-dorost instead of ghalat for "incorrect" here?
While both mean "incorrect" or "wrong," nâ-dorost (formed with the negative prefix nâ- attached to dorost) sounds a bit more formal and precise. This fits the slightly academic or journalistic tone of discussing a "widespread belief" ('aqide-ye shâye'). ghalat would still be understood perfectly, but leans slightly more conversational.

Learn این عقیده‌ی شایع نادرست است؛ در حقیقت بسیار گمراه‌کننده است and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free