Learn Farsi: این اشراف هستند که همیشه راجع به فلان لباس و بهمان ماشین صحبت می‌کنند. - It is the aristocracy who always talk about such-and-such clothes and such-and-such a car.

این اشراف هستند که همیشه راجع به فلان لباس و بهمان ماشین صحبت می‌کنند.in ashrâf hastand ke hamishe râje' be folân lebâs o bahmân mâshin sohbat mikonand.

It is the aristocracy who always talk about such-and-such clothes and such-and-such a car.

Breakdown of این اشراف هستند که همیشه راجع به فلان لباس و بهمان ماشین صحبت می‌کنند.

Questions & Answers about این اشراف هستند که همیشه راجع به فلان لباس و بهمان ماشین صحبت می‌کنند.

Why do we see bahmân paired with folân here?

The word bahmân (and sometimes bisâr) is commonly used as a rhythmic follow-up to folân. When listing multiple unspecified, hypothetical, or trivial things, Farsi speakers use folân for the first item and bahmân for the second. It translates well to "such-and-such and so-and-so" or "this, that, and the other."

Why is there no indefinite -i suffix on lebâs or mâshin after folân and bahmân?

When folân and bahmân are used as determiners (placed directly before a noun, like "such-and-such clothes"), the noun stays in its simple form without the indefinite -i. You only see the -i added to the placeholder itself when it acts as a standalone pronoun (like folâni, meaning "so-and-so" or "a certain person").

Why does the sentence start with in ashrâf hastand ke instead of simply saying ashrâf hamishe...?

This is a "cleft sentence" structure used to add heavy emphasis. By saying in [X] hastand ke... (literally "These are [X] that..."), the speaker is singling out the aristocracy. It perfectly mirrors the English emphatic structure: "It is the aristocracy who..." rather than just "The aristocracy always..."

The verbs hastand and mikonand are plural. Is ashrâf a plural noun?