Questions & Answers about Kun jij het kwetsende commentaar vergeven?
Why is kwetsende formed with an -e at the end, and where does this word come from?
It comes from the verb kwetsen (to hurt or offend). By adding a -d, it becomes a present participle (kwetsend), which translates to "hurting" or "hurtful". Since it acts as an adjective here and is preceded by the definite article het, it takes the standard -e ending.
In English, we say "the hurtful comment" (singular countable). Is commentaar also a countable noun in Dutch?
Usually, no. In Dutch, commentaar is most often an uncountable mass noun, behaving more like "commentary" or "feedback" in English. It also strongly implies criticism. If you want to talk about a single, neutral remark, you would use the countable noun de opmerking.
How could I reply to this question using the niet dat (not that) structure we are currently learning?
You could use it to pre-emptively deny a false assumption about why you haven't forgiven it yet. For example: "Niet dat ik nog boos ben, maar ik heb tijd nodig" (Not that I'm still angry, but I need time). Remember that niet dat introduces a subordinate clause, so the verb (ben) gets pushed to the end of that clause.
Could I use je instead of jij in this sentence?
Yes, but the nuance shifts slightly. By using the emphatic jij, the speaker is placing a strong focus on you—asking if you specifically are able to forgive the comment, perhaps despite how bad it was. The unstressed je would make the question sound much more casual and neutral.
Learn Kun jij het kwetsende commentaar vergeven and more in Dutch
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free