Breakdown of De schuur is verwoest en het graan is nat.
zijn
to be
en
and
verwoesten
to destroy
nat
wet
de schuur
the barn
het graan
the grain
Questions & Answers about De schuur is verwoest en het graan is nat.
How would we rewrite this sentence to say 'The grain is wet due to the fact that the barn is destroyed' using this lesson's grammar?
You can use the phrase vanwege het feit dat or gezien het feit dat (due to the fact that / given the fact that). When you use this, it introduces a subordinate clause, which pushes the conjugated verb to the end: Het graan is nat vanwege het feit dat de schuur verwoest is.
Why does the sentence use is verwoest instead of wordt verwoest?
Using is with a past participle describes a state or the result of a completed action. It means the destruction is already finished and we are looking at the aftermath (the barn is currently in a destroyed state). If you used wordt verwoest, it would mean the action is happening right now (the barn is currently being destroyed).
Graan is used as a mass noun here. If we wanted to talk about a single grain or seed, could we say een graan?
No, het graan refers to the crop or the harvested material collectively, just like 'grain' in English. To talk about a single individual seed, you need to use the word de korrel (the kernel), often combined into the compound noun de graankorrel.
Why doesn't the word en push the verb is to the end of the second clause?
En (and) is a coordinating conjunction, meaning it simply links two independent main clauses together. Because the second part remains a main clause rather than a subordinate one, it keeps the standard subject-verb word order (het graan is nat).
Learn De schuur is verwoest en het graan is nat and more in Dutch
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free