Wij moeten de schade compenseren.

Questions & Answers about Wij moeten de schade compenseren.

In English we say "compensate for the damage". Why is there no preposition like voor in the Dutch sentence?
In Dutch, compenseren is a transitive verb, meaning it takes a direct object without needing a preposition. You just say iets compenseren (to compensate something), so de schade connects directly to the verb.
Could I use vergoeden instead of compenseren here?
Yes, Wij moeten de schade vergoeden is actually more common in everyday Dutch when talking about paying for physical damage. Compenseren is also correct but can sound slightly more formal or apply to broader situations (like compensating for a loss of time).
This lesson is about enerzijds and anderzijds. If I wanted to say "On the one hand, we must compensate for the damage...", how would that affect the word order?
If you start the sentence with the connector, it causes inversion (the verb comes before the subject): Enerzijds moeten wij de schade compenseren... If you start with the subject, the connector comes right after the finite verb: Wij moeten enerzijds de schade compenseren...
Is schade countable? Could I say schades if multiple things were broken?
No, schade is an uncountable noun in Dutch, just like "damage" is in English. Even if several different things were destroyed, you still just refer to it as a lot of damage: veel schade.

Learn Wij moeten de schade compenseren and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free