De stichter, wiens erfenis groot is, is dood.

Questions & Answers about De stichter, wiens erfenis groot is, is dood.

Why is wiens used here instead of wier?
Wiens translates to "whose" and is used when referring back to a masculine or neuter singular noun. Here, it refers to de stichter (the founder), which is a masculine word. If the antecedent were feminine, like de stichtster (the female founder), or plural, you would use wier instead.
Does the gender of the possessed word (erfenis) affect whether we use wiens or wier?
No. Just like in English, the choice of the pronoun depends entirely on the possessor (the antecedent), not the thing being possessed. Even though erfenis is a feminine noun, we use wiens because the possessor (de stichter) is masculine.
Would I hear wiens used in everyday conversation?
Rarely. Both wiens and wier are formal and mostly found in written language or formal speeches. In everyday spoken Dutch, it is much more natural to use van wie (of whom), as in: De stichter, van wie de erfenis groot is, is dood.
Why are there two is verbs right next to each other separated by a comma?
This happens because the relative clause (wiens erfenis groot is) interrupts the main sentence. In a relative clause, the verb (is) gets pushed to the end. The comma marks the end of that clause. The second is is the verb of the main clause (De stichter is dood). Because the entire subject block is in the first position, the V2 (verb-second) rule forces the main verb to come immediately after it.

Learn De stichter, wiens erfenis groot is, is dood and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free