We testen de theorie om de conclusie te bewijzen.

Questions & Answers about We testen de theorie om de conclusie te bewijzen.

Why do we use om ... te here instead of just te?
We use om ... te to express "in order to." When you want to state the purpose or goal of an action (why you are testing the theory), you start the phrase with om and put te right before the infinitive verb at the end.
Why is de conclusie sandwiched between om and te bewijzen?
In an om ... te clause, om always sits at the very beginning of the phrase, and te plus the infinitive verb (bewijzen) go at the very end. Any objects or extra details, like the object de conclusie, are placed between them.
How would you add the modal verb moeten to the first part to say "We must test the theory"?
You would say: We moeten de theorie testen om de conclusie te bewijzen. Because moeten takes the second position as the conjugated verb, the main verb testen gets pushed to the end of the main clause. While your current lesson focuses on using moeten for logical deductions (like "that must be true"), here it serves its other main function: expressing obligation.
Could I use voor instead of om to mean "for proving the conclusion"?
No, that is a common trap for English speakers! While English often uses "for" to show purpose (like "a test for proving"), Dutch never uses voor with an infinitive in this way. You must stick to the om ... te structure.

Learn We testen de theorie om de conclusie te bewijzen and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free