Breakdown of Maakt de donkere schaduw het portret spannend?
maken
to make
donker
dark
spannend
exciting
de schaduw
the shadow
Questions & Answers about Maakt de donkere schaduw het portret spannend?
This lesson is about attributive present participles. Why doesn't spannend get an -e ending here?
Spannend is indeed a present participle (formed by adding -d to the verb spannen). However, it is not used attributively in this sentence because it isn't placed directly before a noun. Instead, it describes the result of the verb (making the portrait exciting). Adjectives and participles in this position don't get an -e ending. If you wanted to say "the exciting portrait", it would be attributive: het spannende portret.
Why is the adjective spelled donkere and not donkerre?
The base adjective is donker. Because it modifies a de word (de schaduw), it gets an -e ending. You might expect the final consonant to double to keep the vowel sound short, but because the stress in donker falls on the first syllable, the final unstressed -er just gets an -e without doubling the r.
Why is spannend placed at the very end of the sentence?
In Dutch, when an adjective describes the state that an object is put into (like making the portrait exciting), it acts as an object complement. These descriptive words are typically pushed to the end of the clause, giving us the word order: Verb + Subject + Object + Adjective.
Does spannend mean "exciting" in a happy, energetic way?