Question 1

Why do we use the infinitive sove here instead of a present participle like sovende?

Accepted Answer

After a verb of perception like at se (to see) or at høre (to hear), Danish uses the bare infinitive (sove) to describe the object's action. English allows both "saw the dragon sleep" and "saw the dragon sleeping," but Danish strictly uses the infinitive in this sentence structure.

Question 2

Why is the noun hule not in its definite form (hulen) since we are talking about "the" dark cave?

Accepted Answer

Because there is an adjective (mørke) in front of it! In Danish, when you add an adjective to a definite noun, the definite suffix on the noun is dropped. Instead, you use the separate definite article (den, det, or de) before the adjective. So, hulen (the cave) becomes den mørke hule (the dark cave).

Question 3

How does Dronningen contrast with den mørke hule regarding how they express "the"?

Accepted Answer

They perfectly demonstrate the two different ways Danish handles definiteness. Because Dronningen has no adjective attached, the definite article is added as a suffix (-en). But because the cave is described by the adjective mørke, it must use the freestanding article den instead.

Question 4

We are currently learning about elative compounds. How could we use one here to emphasize that the cave was absolutely "pitch-black"?

Accepted Answer

You could swap out mørke for a strong elative compound like bælgmørk (pitch-dark). Because it follows the definite article den, you still must apply the standard definite -e ending to the adjective, making the phrase den bælgmørke hule.

Dronningen så dragen sove i den mørke hule.

Breakdown of Dronningen så dragen sove i den mørke hule.

Questions & Answers about Dronningen så dragen sove i den mørke hule.

Learn Dronningen så dragen sove i den mørke hule and more in Danish