Ona je pekla kolač i opekla se.

Questions & Answers about Ona je pekla kolač i opekla se.

Why do the past tense words pekla and opekla look so different from their infinitive forms?
Both come from verbs ending in -ći: peći (to bake) and opeći (to burn). These verbs have irregular past tense stems that often reveal a hidden -k or -g before adding the past tense endings. For a female subject, the ending is -la, so peći becomes pekla and opeći becomes opekla.
Why is there no helping verb je (is) right before opekla se?
Croatian usually drops or shares the helping verb (je) in the second part of a sentence connected by i (and) when the subject is the same. It sounds much more natural to share the first je across both actions rather than repeating it.
Are the verbs peći and opeći related?
Yes! Peći means to bake, roast, or cook. Adding the prefix o- makes it opeći, which means to burn a part of the body. Because they share the same root word, they follow the exact same irregular rules for making the past tense.
What case is the word kolač (cake) in here?
It is in the accusative case because it is the direct object (the thing being baked). Since kolač is a non-living masculine noun, its accusative form looks exactly the same as its dictionary (nominative) form, so the ending doesn't change.
Why do we need the word se at the very end of the sentence?
The word se makes the verb reflexive, meaning the action happens to the subject. Without se, the verb opeći would just mean she burned something else. Adding se changes the meaning to "burned herself."

Learn Ona je pekla kolač i opekla se and more in Croatian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free