Agreeing and Disagreeing | Serbian Grammar

Serbian lets you agree with a person, accept a proposition, share someone else's polarity, or only partly accept an argument. The core expression слагати се is reflexive and takes с(а) + instrumental for the person or position agreed with. Socially natural disagreement often begins by locating the point of agreement before stating the contrast.

Direct agreement

The most useful forms are слажем се, тако је, управо тако, and у праву си/сте.

Expression	Meaning and use
Слажем се.	I agree; neutral
Тако је.	That's right; confirms a statement
Управо тако.	Exactly; emphatic confirmation
У праву си / сте.	You're right; informal / polite or plural
Сагласан/сагласна сам.	I concur; formal, administrative, or legal contexts

Слажем се: прво треба да проверимо чињенице, па тек онда да донесемо одлуку.

I agree: first we should check the facts and only then make a decision.

У праву сте, овај рок је сувише кратак за цео тим.

You're right; this deadline is too short for the whole team. (polite or plural)

Управо тако — проблем није цена, него непоуздан рок испоруке.

Exactly—the problem isn't the price but the unreliable delivery deadline.

У праву is a fixed locative phrase; it is not у право. Сагласан сам is correct but marked as formal compared with everyday слажем се.

Agreeing with a person or position

Use с(а) + instrumental after слагати се. The preposition is са before difficult clusters and in са мном; с тобом, с колегиницом, с предлогом are ordinary.

Слажем се с тобом да нам треба више времена за припрему.

I agree with you that we need more time to prepare. (informal singular)

Не слажемо се са оценом да је пројекат већ завршен.

We disagree with the assessment that the project has already been completed. (neutral/formal)

The instrumental phrase names the person or position. A following да + finite clause states the proposition. Serbian also commonly uses слажем се да... without an overt с тим when only the proposition matters.

Сви се слажемо да би улаз требало боље осветлити.

We all agree that the entrance should be better lit.

Required се is a clitic and normally occupies the early clitic position. It is not an optional marker of emphasis.

💡

Store the complete frame: слагати се с ким/чим да.... The person or position is instrumental; the proposition is a finite да-clause.

When someone states a positive experience or preference, и ја means “me too.” After a negative statement, ни ја means “me neither.” The particle carries the shared polarity.

— Волим да радим рано ујутру. — И ја, тада се најлакше концентришем.

— I like working early in the morning. — Me too; that's when I find it easiest to concentrate.

— Не разумем зашто су променили распоред. — Ни ја; стари је био јаснији.

— I don't understand why they changed the schedule. — Neither do I; the old one was clearer.

When a finite response is available, repeating it is often clearer: Јесам/нисам, хоћу/нећу, могу/не могу. This is particularly useful after a negative question.

The response-particle guide develops this polarity system and the ambiguity of bare да/не after negative questions.

— Зар не мислиш да треба да сачекамо? — Мислим, бар док не стигну сви подаци.

— Don't you think we should wait? — I do, at least until all the data arrive.

The reply мислим explicitly contradicts any possible negative expectation. Bare да could be understood from context, but repeating the verb states the position unmistakably.

Partial agreement and softening

Disagreement need not begin with a blunt не. Useful frames acknowledge a valid part and then limit it with али, ипак, or с друге стране.

Углавном се слажем с предлогом, али бих променила последњу тачку.

I generally agree with the proposal, but I would change the last point. (female speaker)

Разумем шта хоћеш да кажеш, али не мислим да ће то решити главни проблем.

I understand what you mean, but I don't think that will solve the main problem. (informal singular)

Тачно је да је ова опција јефтинија; ипак, одржавање ће касније бити скупље.

It's true that this option is cheaper; nevertheless, maintenance will be more expensive later.

These sentences do not hide disagreement. They specify its scope. Можда, али... and не знам баш are common in conversation; the latter is informal and can signal skepticism even before the speaker gives a reason.

Можда, али зар не би било једноставније да прво питамо кориснике?

Maybe, but wouldn't it be simpler to ask the users first?

Expressing doubt

Нисам сигуран/сигурна да... and нисам уверен/уверена да... question a conclusion without directly accusing the other person of being wrong. The adjective agrees with the speaker.

Нисам сигурна да имамо довољно информација за коначну одлуку.

I'm not sure we have enough information for a final decision. (female speaker)

Нисам уверен да би забрана решила узрок проблема.

I'm not convinced that a ban would solve the cause of the problem. (male speaker)

Чини ми се да... is another softened opinion frame. Dative ми is the experiencer, and се is required.

Чини ми се да занемарујемо трошкове који ће настати касније.

It seems to me that we're overlooking the costs that will arise later.

These frames are not merely “polite words.” They make a precise claim about the speaker's level of certainty.

Clear disagreement

Neutral не слажем се can be followed by the disputed point. Conditional не бих се сложио/сложила is more tentative; не могу да се сложим is often firm despite its modal form.

Не слажем се с тим закључком јер подаци обухватају само један месец.

I disagree with that conclusion because the data cover only one month.

Не бих се сложила да је једино решење да откажемо цео догађај.

I wouldn't agree that canceling the whole event is the only solution. (female speaker)

Не могу да се сложим са одлуком која искључује половину учесника.

I cannot agree with a decision that excludes half the participants. (firm, neutral/formal)

Direct ниси у праву / нисте у праву is grammatical and sometimes necessary, but it evaluates the other person's correctness rather than only one proposition. Add the exact point and evidence when the relationship or setting calls for care.

По том питању нисте у праву: рок није уторак, него четвртак.

On that point you're mistaken: the deadline isn't Tuesday but Thursday. (polite or plural; direct)

Напротив introduces an opposing fact that reverses the previous assumption, not just any contrast.

Не мислим да је расправа била бескорисна; напротив, открила је где се заиста не слажемо.

I don't think the discussion was useless; on the contrary, it revealed where we truly disagree.

Слагати се versus договорити се

Слагати се describes sharing an opinion or being compatible. Договорити се means reach an agreement or make an arrangement. The result can be summarized with договорено.

Не слажемо се око свих детаља, али смо се договорили да наставимо разговор у понедељак.

We don't agree on every detail, but we agreed to continue the discussion on Monday.

The first clause describes continuing difference; the second reports a concrete joint arrangement. Do not use договорити се merely because English says agree if no plan or settlement was reached.

Situational dialogue

— Мислим да би требало потпуно затворити улицу за саобраћај. — Слажем се да пешацима треба више простора, али нисам сигурна да је потпуно затварање најбоље решење. — Шта онда предлажеш? — Могли бисмо прво да ограничимо саобраћај викендом. — То ми делује разумно; договоримо се да проверимо трошкове.

— I think the street should be completely closed to traffic. — I agree that pedestrians need more space, but I'm not sure complete closure is the best solution. — What do you suggest then? — We could first restrict traffic on weekends. — That seems reasonable to me; let's agree to check the costs. (second speaker is female; informal exchange)

The second speaker marks common ground, narrows the disagreement, and proposes an alternative. Final договоримо се moves from opinion to a joint next step.

Practice Tasks

Task 1: Agree at three levels

Respond to an opinion with тако је, then слажем се с + instrumental, then a full слажем се да + clause. Keep the meanings distinct.

Task 2: Disagree constructively

Write one partial agreement with али, one uncertainty statement with an agreeing adjective, and one firm disagreement followed by a concrete reason.

Common Mistakes

❌ Слажем са твојим предлогом.

Incorrect—the verb is reflexive and requires се.

✅ Слажем се с твојим предлогом да почнемо раније.

I agree with your proposal that we start earlier.

❌ Не слажем се са тебе по овом питању.

Incorrect case—с(а) after слагати се requires instrumental тобом.

✅ Не слажем се с тобом по овом питању, али разумем твој разлог.

I disagree with you on this issue, but I understand your reason.

❌ Ја сам слажем се да треба да сачекамо.

Incorrect construction—do not add copular сам before the finite verb слажем.

✅ Слажем се да треба да сачекамо коначне резултате.

I agree that we should wait for the final results.

❌ — Не волим радне састанке без дневног реда. — Не ја.

Incorrect English-style reply—Serbian uses ни ја for ‘me neither.’

✅ — Не волим радне састанке без дневног реда. — Ни ја.

— I don't like work meetings without an agenda. — Neither do I.

❌ Сигуран сам да нисте у право.

Incorrect fixed phrase—after у use locative праву.

✅ Мислим да по овом питању нисте у праву.

I think you're mistaken on this point. (polite or plural)

Key Takeaways

Слагати се requires се and takes с(а) + instrumental for the person or position.
Use и ја after a positive statement and ни ја after a negative one.
Mark partial agreement with frames such as углавном се слажем, али....
Нисам сигуран/сигурна, чини ми се, and conditional не бих се сложио/сложила express precise degrees of certainty and commitment.
Слагати се shares an opinion; договорити се reaches an arrangement.

Now practice Serbian

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Serbian →