Nominative in Predicates and Naming

The previous page established the nominative as the dictionary form and the subject. This page follows the case into its other big territory: predicates and naming. When you say what something is (Он врач), what you call someone (Меня́ зову́т Анна), or you write a title, a label, or a list, the noun typically stands in the nominative — in its bare citation form. The single most important thing here is a contrast: the present-tense predicate is nominative, but the past- and future-tense predicate prefers the instrumental (Он был врачо́м). Getting that boundary right, and resisting the urge to conjugate "to be" in the present, is what this page is for.

The predicate nominative in the present tense

Because Russian has no present-tense copula (no word for am/is/are), an "X is Y" sentence is just two nominatives sitting beside each other: the subject and the predicate noun, with nothing — or, in writing, a dash — between them. Both are nominative.

Э́то мой брат.

This is my brother. — это points; мой брат is the nominative predicate.

Москва́ — большо́й го́род.

Moscow is a big city. — Москва́ (subject) and большо́й го́род (predicate), both nominative; the dash stands in for the missing verb.

Мой оте́ц — врач, а мать — учи́тельница.

My father is a doctor, and my mother is a teacher. — врач and учи́тельница are bare nominative predicates.

The dash is a writing convention, not a verb: Russian inserts it between two nouns (or a noun and a noun phrase) when the copula is absent, especially when the subject is itself a noun (Москва́ — столи́ца). With a pronoun subject (Он врач) the dash is usually dropped. Either way, nothing is conjugated. The reflex to insert есть or a form of быть is the number-one error here; in the present, the gap is the grammar.

💡

есть is not the present-tense "is" of identity. Он есть врач is wrong; Он врач is right. (есть survives only in the existential sense "there is/exists" and in possession У меня́ есть маши́на — "I have a car" — never as the everyday copula linking a subject to a predicate noun.) See быть.

это as an invariable pointer

The presentational это ("this is / these are") is frozen — it never changes for gender or number — and the noun it introduces is nominative. That stays true even when the complement is plural:

Э́то кни́ги.

These are books. — это stays singular and invariable; only the complement кни́ги is plural nominative.

Э́то мои́ друзья́ из университе́та.

These are my friends from university. — это unchanged; мои́ друзья́ is nominative plural.

Do not be tempted to make это agree ("э́ти кни́ги" would mean "these books" — a different, demonstrative construction). The presentational это is one fixed word; its complement carries the nominative. The demonstrative-vs-presentational distinction is detailed on это as a presentational word and the lists/titles uses on nominative in lists and titles.

Naming: Меня́ зову́т Анна

Now the construction that genuinely surprises learners. To say "My name is Anna," Russian says Меня́ зову́т Анна, which literally means "They call me Anna." Two things are going on:

зову́т is the third-person plural of звать ("to call") — an impersonal "they," with no stated subject.
меня́ is the accusative of я (me) — the person being called is the object of "they call."
Анна is in the nominative — it is the name itself, standing in citation form, not an object.

Меня́ зову́т Анна.

My name is Anna. — literally 'they call me Anna': меня́ (acc., the person), Анна (nom., the name).

Как тебя́ зову́т? — Меня́ зову́т Ива́н.

What's your name? — My name is Ivan. — тебя́/меня́ accusative, Ива́н nominative.

Его́ зову́т Серге́й, а её — Ма́ша.

His name is Sergey, and hers is Masha. — его́/её accusative, the names nominative.

This split — accusative for the person, nominative for the name — is exactly backwards from the English instinct, where "Anna" feels like the predicate of "my name is." In Russian the name is simply quoted in its base form. (A formal alternative, Моё и́мя — Анна, "My name is Anna," uses the predicate-nominative pattern from above; зову́т is the everyday spoken version. More on introductions: introducing yourself.)

💡

Parse Меня́ зову́т Анна as "Me — they-call — Anna." Once you see меня́ as the object and Анна as a quoted label, the case assignment stops feeling strange: the name is named, not acted upon, so it stays nominative.

Apposition: the name sits next to the noun in the nominative

When a generic noun is followed by a proper name that identifies it — the city of Moscow, the magazine "Ogonyok" — Russian places the name in apposition, and in the nominative it simply stands beside the head noun in the same (nominative) form. No "of" is needed:

Го́род Москва́ — столи́ца Росси́и.

The city of Moscow is the capital of Russia. — го́род and Москва́ are both nominative, side by side (no 'of').

Журна́л «Огонёк» выходи́л с 1923 го́да.

The magazine 'Ogonyok' had been published since 1923. — журна́л and the title «Огонёк» both nominative in apposition.

Note the Russian quotation marks « » (guillemets) around titles. The title inside them often stays in the nominative even when the head noun declines — в журна́ле «Огонёк», not *«Огоньке́» — because the quoted title is treated as a fixed label. This citation behavior is the same instinct as in lists and headlines, where nouns are presented in their base nominative form.

Спи́сок поку́пок: хлеб, молоко́, я́йца, сыр.

Shopping list: bread, milk, eggs, cheese. — every item is in the nominative citation form.

The crucial contrast: present nominative vs past/future instrumental

This is the boundary that defines the page. In the present, the predicate noun is nominative (no copula). In the past and future, where the verb быть actually appears (был / была́ / бу́дет), the predicate noun normally shifts into the instrumental:

Tense	Sentence	Predicate case
Present	Он врач.	nominative — врач
Past	Он был врачо́м.	instrumental — врачо́м
Future	Он бу́дет врачо́м.	instrumental — врачо́м

Сейча́с он студе́нт, а ра́ньше он был шко́льником.

Now he's a student, and before he was a schoolboy. — present студе́нт (nom.), past был шко́льником (instr.).

Когда́ я вы́расту, я бу́ду инжене́ром.

When I grow up, I'll be an engineer. — future бу́ду инжене́ром, instrumental predicate.

The logic, in brief: the nominative predicate states a permanent identity (this is what he is), while the instrumental predicate frames a role held over a stretch of time — a state that was true then or will be true, implying a before and after. Since the past and future inherently bracket a period, the instrumental is the natural fit. The full treatment, including the cases where even the present can take the instrumental, is on the instrumental predicate; choosing between the two is itself a decision-guide topic.

Common Mistakes

❌ Он есть врач.

Incorrect — no present-tense copula; the predicate noun врач stands alone in the nominative.

✅ Он врач.

He is a doctor. — bare nominative predicate.

❌ Меня́ зову́т Анну.

Incorrect — the NAME is nominative, not accusative; only the person (меня́) is accusative.

✅ Меня́ зову́т Анна.

My name is Anna. — Анна in the nominative as a quoted label.

❌ Э́ти кни́ги (meaning 'these are books').

Incorrect for presentation — э́ти agrees and means 'these books' (a phrase, not a sentence); the presentational pointer is the frozen это.

✅ Э́то кни́ги.

These are books. — invariable это + nominative plural complement.

❌ Ра́ньше он был врач.

Incorrect — in the past tense with был, the predicate noun normally takes the instrumental.

✅ Ра́ньше он был врачо́м.

He used to be a doctor. — instrumental predicate врачо́м after был.

Key Takeaways

In the present tense, the predicate noun is nominative with no copula: Это мой брат, Москва́ — большо́й го́род, Он врач. Never insert есть.
это is an invariable pointer; its complement is nominative even when plural (Это кни́ги).
Naming: Меня́ зову́т Анна = "they call me Anna" — меня́ is accusative (the person), Анна is nominative (the name).
Apposition keeps both nouns nominative: го́род Москва́, журна́л «Огонёк»; titles, headlines, and lists use the citation (nominative) form.
Crucial contrast: present-tense predicate = nominative (Он врач), but past/future with быть = instrumental (Он был / бу́дет врачо́м). Full detail on the instrumental predicate.

Now practice Russian

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Russian→