Conjunctiv Triggers: A Reference List

The conjunctiv never appears out of nowhere — it is always triggered by something in front of it: a verb, an impersonal expression, or a conjunction that demands . This page is your reference list: a grouped, scannable catalogue of the triggers, with one example each, so you can look up "does this verb take ?" at a glance. But a list you have to memorize item by item is fragile, so we also give you the one idea that generates the whole list — the conjunctiv marks irrealis content, events the speaker presents as wanted, needed, feared, or merely possible rather than asserted as fact. Learn the principle and the list becomes predictable rather than arbitrary.

The unifying principle: irrealis, not fact

Every trigger below shares one feature: the embedded event is not asserted to be true. You want something to happen (it hasn't yet); you need it; you allow it; you fear it; you aim for it; you call it possible or important. In each case the action lives in the realm of wishes, requirements, and possibilities — not established reality. That is exactly what the conjunctiv exists to mark.

The flip side is just as useful: whenever the main verb does present the embedded event as real — saying, knowing, believing, perceiving — Romanian abandons and uses că + indicative instead (știu că vine, "I know he's coming"). So the trigger list is really a list of non-factual stances. If you can tell whether a predicate asserts a fact or steers toward something not-yet-real, you can predict the connector even for a verb you've never met.

💡
The master test: does the predicate present the event as real/known (→ + indicative) or as wanted, needed, feared, possible, intended (→ + conjunctiv)? Every entry in the table below is one flavour of "not-yet-real."

Volition: wanting, wishing, preferring

Verbs of desire are the prototype trigger — you want an event that isn't real yet.

TriggerMeaningExample
a vreato wantVreau plec.
a dorito wishDoresc vă mulțumesc.
a preferato preferPrefer rămân acasă.
a-și dorito long forÎmi doresc reușesc.

Vreau să învăț să gătesc anul ăsta.

I want to learn to cook this year.

Prefer să iau trenul, e mai relaxant.

I prefer to take the train, it's more relaxing.

Necessity and modals

Obligation and ability describe events that are required or possible — not yet realized.

TriggerMeaningExample
trebuiemust / have toTrebuie plec.
a puteacan / be able toPot te ajut.
e nevoieit's necessaryE nevoie anunțăm.
a avea de gândto intendAm de gând mă mut.

Trebuie să trec pe la bancă înainte de prânz.

I have to stop by the bank before noon.

Poți să-mi dai numărul lui?

Can you give me his number?

(A putea is the one common trigger that also allows a bare infinitive: pot să te ajut = te pot ajuta. See conjunctiv vs infinitive.)

Permission and causation

Letting, allowing, forbidding, and making someone do something all point at an event the subject brings about or permits.

TriggerMeaningExample
a lăsato let / allowLas-o intre.
a permiteto permitNu permit se vorbească a.
a interziceto forbidA interzis fumăm aici.
a face (pe cineva) săto make sb doM-a făcut râd.

Lasă-l să termine ce are de spus.

Let him finish what he has to say.

Filmul m-a făcut să plâng.

The film made me cry.

Emotion and reaction

Emotion verbs take when the feeling is about a prospective event (for the full fact-vs-prospect split, see after emotion verbs).

TriggerMeaningExample
a se bucurato be gladMă bucur te văd.
a se temeto fearMă tem să nu cad.
a-i fi fricăto be afraidMi-e frică conduc noaptea.
a-i părea răuto be sorryÎmi pare rău aud asta.

Mi-e frică să rămân singură în casă noaptea.

I'm afraid to stay home alone at night.

Mă bucur să te revăd după atâția ani.

I'm glad to see you again after so many years.

Impersonal expressions

Necessity, possibility, advice, and worth — all judgments about non-real events. (Full treatment on the impersonals page.)

TriggerMeaningExample
e bineit's good toE bine te odihnești.
e greuit's hard toE greu renunți.
e posibilit's possibleE posibil plouă.
e importantit's importantE important dormi destul.
merităit's worthMerită încerci.

E important să bei multă apă pe căldura asta.

It's important to drink a lot of water in this heat.

Merită să vezi expoziția înainte să se închidă.

It's worth seeing the exhibition before it closes.

Purpose

Goal clauses use ca să ("in order to") — the event is the aim, not yet achieved.

Am plecat mai devreme ca să prind autobuzul.

I left earlier in order to catch the bus.

Vorbește mai rar ca să te înțeleagă toți.

Speak more slowly so everyone understands you.

Aspectual (phase) verbs

Verbs marking the start, continuation, or end of an activity take on the following verb.

TriggerMeaningExample
a începeto beginA început plouă.
a continuato continueContinuă citească.
a termina / a (se) apucato finish / set aboutM-am apucat învăț.

A început să ningă pe la prânz.

It started to snow around noon.

Copilul a continuat să plângă toată seara.

The child kept crying all evening.

After certain conjunctions

A handful of conjunctions and connectors lexically demand , regardless of the main verb.

ConnectorMeaningExample
până săbefore (sth happens)Până ajung, plecaseră.
fără săwithout (doing)A plecat fără spună nimic.
în loc săinstead of (doing)În loc dormi, citești.
înainte săbefore (doing)Sună-mă înainte pleci.

A ieșit din casă fără să-și ia umbrela.

He left the house without taking his umbrella.

În loc să te plângi, fă ceva.

Instead of complaining, do something.

The crucial limit: not every "that"-clause takes

The most damaging assumption is that any English "that"-clause becomes in Romanian. It does not. Verbs of saying, knowing, believing, and perceiving present their complement as a fact, so they take că + indicative, never . This is the boundary of the trigger list, and Romanian is stricter about it than its Romance cousins — see conjunctiv vs indicative after belief verbs.

Cred că ai dreptate.

I think you're right. (belief → că + indicative, NOT 'cred să')

Știu că vine mâine.

I know he's coming tomorrow. (knowledge → că + indicative)

💡
The trigger list is a list of non-factual stances. The moment a verb asserts something is real — spune că, știe că, e adevărat că, cred că — you leave the list entirely and use + indicative.

Common Mistakes

❌ Cred să ai dreptate.

Incorrect — belief asserts a fact (to the speaker), so it takes că: cred că ai dreptate.

✅ Cred că ai dreptate.

I think you're right.

❌ Spune să vine mâine.

Incorrect — reporting what someone says is factual: spune că vine. (Spune să would mean 'he tells someone to come'.)

✅ Spune că vine mâine.

He says he's coming tomorrow.

❌ E posibil că plouă.

Incorrect — possibility is non-factual, so it takes să: e posibil să plouă.

✅ E posibil să plouă.

It might rain.

❌ A plecat fără spună nimic.

Incorrect — fără is a să-trigger; the verb needs să: fără să spună nimic.

✅ A plecat fără să spună nimic.

He left without saying anything.

❌ A început plouă.

Incorrect — aspectual a începe triggers să: a început să plouă.

✅ A început să plouă.

It started to rain.

Key Takeaways

  • The conjunctiv is triggered by irrealis stances: wanting, needing, allowing, fearing, judging possible, aiming, beginning, and certain conjunctions (fără să, în loc să, până să).
  • Group the triggers by meaning — volition, necessity, permission, emotion, impersonals, purpose, aspectual, conjunctions — and one example each anchors the whole set.
  • The boundary of the list: factual predicates (say, know, believe, perceive) take că + indicative, not .
  • If you can sort a new predicate as "asserts a fact" vs "steers toward the not-yet-real," you can predict its connector without memorizing it.

Now practice Romanian

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Romanian

Related Topics

  • The Conjunctiv (să-Subjunctive): OverviewA2An introduction to Romanian's most important feature — the să + verb construction that replaces the infinitive after want, can, and must.
  • Conjunctiv vs Indicative After Belief VerbsB2Why belief and assertion verbs (a crede, a ști, a spune, a fi sigur) keep the indicative in Romanian even when negated or doubtful — a major divergence from French, Spanish, and Italian, which force the subjunctive after negated belief.
  • Conjunctiv After Emotion and Reaction VerbsB2How emotion verbs (a se bucura, a-i părea rău/bine, a se teme, a-i fi frică) split between că + indicative for a realized fact and să + conjunctiv for a prospective event — plus the special să nu of fearing.
  • să-Subjunctive vs InfinitiveB1When to chain verbs with the să-subjunctive (Vreau să plec) and the narrow set of cases where Romanian still uses the bare infinitive — almost exclusively after prepositions (pentru a reuși, fără a ști) and after a putea.
  • că vs să (Complementizers)A2The factivity test that decides between că and să — că introduces facts you assert or report (Știu că vine, with the indicative), să introduces actions you want, command, fear, or treat as uncertain (Vreau să vină, with the subjunctive).
  • Conjunctiv After Impersonal ExpressionsB1When impersonal expressions of necessity, possibility, and judgment (trebuie să, e bine să, e posibil să, merită să) trigger the conjunctiv — and why factive impersonals take 'că + indicative' instead.