Supposition with انگار and گویا | Farsi Grammar

انگار and گویا let a Persian speaker present a proposition as an appearance, an inference, or information that is not being asserted without qualification. Both can correspond to English apparently, it seems, or as if, but they do not contribute exactly the same tone: انگار is the ordinary conversational choice, while گویا creates greater distance and is especially at home in careful writing and reports.

Neither word is a verb that conjugates, and neither automatically selects one fixed mood. The verb inside the proposition remains finite; its tense locates the situation in time, while indicative or subjunctive mood reflects how the speaker frames that situation.

The basic construction

The marker normally stands before the proposition it qualifies. که may follow it, especially in the more explicitly comparative pattern انگار که ... “as if ...,” but ordinary inferential انگار and گویا do not require که.

Pattern	Typical interpretation	Register
انگار + finite indicative	an immediate impression or tentative inference	neutral/informal
گویا + finite indicative	distanced or report-like supposition	formal-neutral, written
انگار که + subjunctive	an imagined comparison, often contrary to appearance or fact	neutral to literary
گویا که ...	possible but heavier than simple گویا ...	formal/literary

انگار لپ‌تاپت دوباره هنگ کرده است.

engâr laptop-at dobâre hang karde ast.

It looks as though your laptop has frozen again. (neutral conversation; inference from the situation)

گویا قطار به‌دلیل نقص فنی متوقف شده است.

guyâ qatâr be-dalil-e naqs-e fanni motavaqqef shode ast.

Apparently the train has stopped because of a technical fault. (formal-neutral; distanced report)

English often inserts a dummy subject and a verb—it seems that. Persian needs neither: انگار and گویا can scope directly over the following clause. Adding است immediately after the marker, as though translating “it is apparent,” changes the construction and is usually wrong.

💡

Separate three jobs: انگار/گویا marks the speaker's stance; tense locates the event; mood presents it as an assessed proposition or an imagined comparison. One marker does not do all three jobs.

Indicative: the default for a tentative proposition

When speakers advance a proposition as their best current reading of the evidence, the embedded verb is normally indicative. A present indicative describes a current state or unfolding event; a past form describes an earlier event; a perfect connects an earlier event to present evidence. The uncertainty does not erase those tense contrasts.

انگار سارا کلیدش را داخل ماشین جا گذاشته است.

engâr sârâ kelid-ash râ dâkhel-e mâshin jâ gozâshte ast.

It looks like Sara has left her key in the car. (neutral; inference with a present result)

گویا مدیر از تصمیم دیروزش منصرف شده است.

guyâ modir az tasmim-e diruz-ash monsaref shode ast.

Apparently the manager has changed his mind about yesterday's decision. (formal-neutral; report-like inference)

انگار کسی در اتاق کناری گریه می‌کند.

engâr kasi dar otâq-e kenâri gerye mi-konad.

It sounds as though someone is crying in the next room. (neutral conversation; sensory impression)

The perfect is common because present traces invite an inference about an earlier cause. It is not obligatory, however. انگار گریه می‌کند is simultaneous with the impression, whereas انگار گریه کرده است locates the crying earlier and presents it as relevant now. See The Present Perfect as an Evidential for the important warning that the perfect itself is not a dedicated hearsay form.

Subjunctive: imagined likeness, not an automatic rule

The subjunctive becomes natural when انگار که introduces a scene construed as imagined, unreal, or contrary to what is known. This is especially common with the perfect subjunctive past participle + باشد. Compare an ordinary tentative diagnosis with a consciously unreal comparison:

انگار حالش بهتر شده است.

engâr hâl-ash behtar shode ast.

It seems that she is feeling better. (neutral; tentative assessment of a possible fact)

طوری لبخند می‌زد، انگار که هیچ اتفاقی نیفتاده باشد.

towri labkhand mi-zad, engâr ke hich ettefâqi na-yoftâde bâshad.

She was smiling as though nothing had happened. (neutral/literary; counterfactual-like comparison)

The indicative does not guarantee truth, and the subjunctive does not simply mean “more uncertain.” Indicative انگار مریض است offers “she seems ill” as a tentative diagnosis. Subjunctive انگار که مریض باشد more readily compares her behavior or appearance to that of someone ill; the context may even establish that she is not ill. In relaxed conversation, speakers also use an indicative after انگار که, so there is no reliable word-trigger rule to memorize.

با من حرف می‌زند انگار که سال‌هاست همدیگر را می‌شناسیم.

bâ man harf mi-zanad engâr ke sâl-hâ-st hamdigar râ mi-shenâsim.

He talks to me as if we have known each other for years. (neutral; vivid comparison with an indicative perfect-like state)

💡

After انگار که, ask whether you are proposing an explanation or staging an imagined likeness. The first favors an indicative; the second often favors a subjunctive, especially ... کرده باشد.

Evidential distance and speaker commitment

گویا often sounds as though the speaker is standing back from the claim: the information may come from a report, scattered evidence, or incomplete recollection. That distance makes it useful in news analysis, historical prose, and cautious summaries (formal/academic). انگار more often presents an impression arising in the immediate conversation (neutral/informal).

گویا این نسخه پیش از چاپ نهایی بازبینی نشده بود.

guyâ in noskhe pish az châp-e nehâyi bâzbini na-shode bud.

Apparently this version had not been reviewed before final publication. (formal/academic; cautious reconstruction)

— چرا نیما جواب نمی‌دهد؟ — انگار هنوز خوابه.

— cherâ nimâ javâb nemi-dahad? — engâr hanuz khâb-e.

‘Why isn't Nima answering?’ ‘Looks like he's still asleep.’ (informal, regional: Tehran; only the reply has a colloquial copula)

Neither marker identifies the evidence source by itself. گویا is not a quotation marker, and انگار does not prove direct perception. If the source matters, name it: طبق گزارش ... “according to the report,” از همسایه شنیدم ... “I heard from the neighbor,” or از صدایش معلوم است ... “it is clear from her voice.” Likewise, stronger باید رفته باشد expresses a deduction the speaker treats as compelling; گویا رفته است presents the conclusion more cautiously.

Negation normally stays inside the proposition: انگار نیامده است “it seems she has not come.” Initial نه انگار ... is possible only as discourse repair—roughly “no, apparently ...”—and is not ordinary sentential negation.

Common Mistakes

1. Using an infinitive instead of a finite proposition

❌ انگار او دیر رسیدن.

Incorrect — رسیدن is an infinitive and cannot locate the supposed event or agree with its subject.

✅ انگار پیک امروز دیرتر می‌رسد.

engâr peyk emruz dirtar mi-rasad.

It looks as though the courier will arrive later today.

2. Treating the subjunctive as mechanically obligatory

⚠️ گویا جلسه لغو بشود.

guyâ jalase laghv be-shavad.

Possible for a projected cancellation, but not the ordinary form for reporting evidence that the meeting has already been cancelled.

✅ گویا جلسه‌ی عصر را لغو کرده‌اند.

guyâ jalase-ye asr râ laghv karde-and.

Apparently they have cancelled the afternoon meeting.

3. Misplacing negation on the stance marker

❌ نانگار برق قطع شده است.

Incorrect — انگار does not take the verbal negative prefix نـ.

✅ انگار برق این طبقه هنوز وصل نشده است.

engâr barq-e in tabaqe hanuz vasl na-shode ast.

It seems the power on this floor has not been restored yet.

4. Mixing standard and Tehran forms

⚠️ گویا مسئول بخش هنوز نیومده است.

guyâ mas'ul-e bakhsh hanuz na-yumade ast.

A mixed-register hybrid: avoid colloquial نیومده with formal است in consistently standard prose.

✅ گویا مسئول بخش هنوز به اداره نیامده است.

guyâ mas'ul-e bakhsh hanuz be edâre na-yâmade ast.

Apparently the section manager has not arrived at the office yet. (formal-neutral)

Key Takeaways

انگار is the usual immediate, conversational marker; گویا is more distanced and more frequent in careful writing.
An indicative normally presents a tentative proposition. A subjunctive is especially natural in an imagined or contrary-to-fact انگار که comparison.
Tense still tracks time: present for simultaneous situations, past for past narration, and perfect for an earlier event tied to current evidence.
Put negation inside the proposition, and name the source explicitly when source—not merely uncertainty—matters.

Now practice Farsi

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Farsi →