Concessive Free-Choice Clauses | Farsi Grammar

Persian concessive free-choice clauses mean “no matter how much,” “whoever,” “whatever,” or “wherever—even then.” In هرقدر هم که توضیح بدهی، قانع نمی‌شود “No matter how much you explain, he will not be convinced,” the subordinate clause ranges over every possible amount of explaining, while the main clause is declared stable across that whole range.

The maximally explicit architecture is هر + domain word + هم + که + clause, normally with a subjunctive verb. هم strengthens the concessive focus: it highlights even the most favorable or extreme alternative and says that this alternative still cannot change the outcome. که marks the clause boundary but is often omitted in concise speech and writing: هرقدر هم تلاش کنی is also standard.

The free-choice system

Frame	Domain	Typical English rendering	Register
هرقدر هم که ...	degree or quantity	however much / no matter how much	neutral/formal
هرکس هم که ...	person	whoever / no matter who	neutral/formal
هرچه هم که ...	thing, content, degree	whatever / however much	neutral
هرجا هم که ...	place	wherever / no matter where	neutral
هرطور هم که ...	manner	however / no matter how	neutral

هرقدر هم که عجله کنی، پیش از ساعت شش نمی‌رسی.

har-qadar ham ke ajale koni, pish az sâ'at-e shesh nemi-rasi.

No matter how much you hurry, you will not arrive before six. (neutral; degree free choice)

هرکس هم که زنگ بزند، اطلاعات شخصی مشتری را ندهید.

har-kas ham ke zang be-zanad, ettelâ'ât-e shakhsi-ye moshtari râ na-dahid.

Whoever calls, do not give out the customer's personal information. (neutral workplace instruction)

هرجا هم که زندگی کنی، یاد گرفتن زبان محلی کمکت می‌کند.

har-jâ ham ke zendegi koni, yâd gereftan-e zabân-e mahalli komak-at mi-konad.

Wherever you live, learning the local language helps you. (neutral generalization)

English combines -ever words with no matter. Persian instead builds a transparent series around هر “every” and may add focus هم plus boundary marker که. Do not translate the English words separately; learn how the whole clause ranges over alternatives.

💡

Ask whether changing the person, place, amount, or manner could change the main result. If the speaker says “not even at the extreme,” the concessive free-choice frame fits.

Why the subjunctive is normal

The subordinate clause does not assert one particular event. It surveys possible values: perhaps you explain a little, perhaps at length; perhaps Ali comes, perhaps another person. Because no single alternative is established as fact, Persian normally uses the present subjunctive.

هرچه هم که بگویی، او تصمیمش را عوض نخواهد کرد.

har-che ham ke be-guyi, u tasmim-ash râ avaz na-khâhad kard.

Whatever you say, she will not change her decision. (formal-neutral; possible content, invariant result)

هرطور هم که حساب کنیم، بودجه برای این طرح کافی نیست.

har-towr ham ke hesâb konim, budje barâ-ye in tarh kâfi nist.

However we calculate it, the budget is not sufficient for this plan. (formal/academic)

The main clause has no special required mood. It may state a fact, prediction, obligation, or command; only its independence from the alternatives matters. Negatives are frequent because speakers often deny that any effort can overcome a limit, but an affirmative result is equally grammatical.

هرکدام را هم که انتخاب کنید، دو سال ضمانت دارد.

har-kodâm râ ham ke entekhâb konid, do sâl zamânat dârad.

Whichever one you choose, it has a two-year warranty. (neutral customer service; affirmative result)

What هم contributes

Without هم, a هر- clause can be an ordinary free relative identifying an unrestricted participant: هرکس زودتر برسد، در را باز می‌کند “Whoever arrives first opens the door.” Context can also give a bare هر- clause an unconditional reading. Adding هم makes that concession explicit: even the least expected candidate or the highest imaginable degree leaves the result intact.

هرکس زودتر برسد، کلید را از نگهبانی می‌گیرد.

har-kas zud-tar be-rasad, kelid râ az negahbâni mi-girad.

Whoever arrives first will get the key from reception. (neutral ordinary free relative; no concessive هم)

هرکس هم که زودتر برسد، در بسته را نمی‌تواند باز کند.

har-kas ham ke zud-tar be-rasad, dar-e baste râ nemi-tavânad bâz konad.

No matter who arrives first, they cannot open the locked door. (neutral concessive free choice)

This is close to an unconditional: instead of linking one condition to one result, it quantifies over all relevant conditions. Compare ordinary provision clauses, where satisfying a particular condition does affect the outcome.

💡

هم is meaningful but not obligatory. It foregrounds the obstacle-resistant reading; without it, context must distinguish concessive “no matter who” from ordinary “whoever.”

Free choice versus factual concession

با اینکه and هرچند concede a fact already accepted: “although it was raining.” A free-choice clause does not select one fact; it considers every possible amount or identity. This semantic difference explains why factual concession readily takes the indicative, whereas free choice favors the subjunctive.

با اینکه باران می‌بارید، مسابقه برگزار شد.

bâ in-ke bârân mi-bârid, mosâbeqe bargozâr shod.

Although it was raining, the match took place. (neutral; factual concession)

هرقدر هم که باران ببارد، این مسیر بسته نمی‌شود.

har-qadar ham ke bârân be-bârad, in masir baste nemi-shavad.

No matter how much it rains, this route does not close. (neutral; all possible degrees)

For the full factual contrast, see Concession with با اینکه and هرچند.

Informal Iranian Persian

In everyday speech, especially (informal, regional: Tehran), هرچی commonly replaces written هرچه, and که is often omitted. Standard prose keeps هرچه, with هم که when explicit concessive focus is useful. Colloquial forms such as بگی are shortened, but remain subjunctive in their distribution.

هرچی هم که بگی، من بدون رسید پول نمی‌دم.

har-chi ham ke be-gi, man bedun-e resid pul nemi-dam.

Whatever you say, I'm not paying without a receipt. (informal, regional: Tehran)

In formal writing, do not respell هرچه as هرچی, and avoid mixing a highly colloquial clause with dense academic prose unless quoting speech.

Common Mistakes

1. Using an infinitive instead of a finite free-choice clause

❌ هرقدر هم که توضیح دادن، نتیجه عوض نمی‌شود.

Incorrect — the free-choice clause needs a finite verb agreeing with its understood subject, not infinitive توضیح دادن.

✅ هرقدر هم که توضیح بدهی، نتیجه عوض نمی‌شود.

har-qadar ham ke towzih be-dahi, natije avaz nemi-shavad.

No matter how much you explain, the result will not change.

2. Stacking a future auxiliary with a subjunctive

❌ هرجا هم که فردا خواهی بروی، به من خبر بده.

Incorrect — future auxiliary خواهی would require short infinitive رفت; the free-choice clause instead uses finite subjunctive بروی by itself.

✅ هرجا هم که فردا بروی، به من خبر بده.

har-jâ ham ke fardâ be-ravi, be man khabar be-dah.

Wherever you go tomorrow, let me know.

3. Translating English ‘no matter’ twice

English can tempt learners to prepend مهم نیست to a complete concessive free-choice clause. The longer مهم نیست هرکس هم که بیاید، در را باز نکن is interpretable in loose speech, but it establishes indifference twice and is unnecessarily heavy. Use one frame in neutral Persian:

✅ هرکس هم که بیاید، در را باز نکن.

har-kas ham ke bi-âyad, dar râ bâz na-kon.

No matter who comes, do not open the door.

Key Takeaways

The maximally explicit pattern is هر + domain + هم + که, normally followed by the subjunctive; که is often optional.
هم strengthens the claim that even the strongest or least expected alternative cannot change the result, but context can license an unconditional reading without it.
The main clause may be affirmative or negative; it must simply hold throughout the alternatives.
Use با اینکه/هرچند for a conceded fact, not for an open range of people, places, or degrees.
Keep colloquial هرچی in explicitly informal Iranian dialogue; standard writing uses هرچه.

Now practice Farsi

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Farsi →