Breakdown of Kimler darılıp düğüne gelmedi?
gelmek
to come
düğün
wedding
kimler
who (plural) / who all
darılmak
to take offense (and become estranged)
Questions & Answers about Kimler darılıp düğüne gelmedi?
Why do we use kimler here instead of just kim?
Adding the plural suffix to a question word like kim shows that the speaker expects the answer to involve multiple people. It translates naturally to 'who all' or 'which people' in English, making it clear that a list of names is expected rather than just one person.
What is the function of the -ıp suffix in darılıp?
The -ıp (or -ip/-up/-üp) suffix acts as a conjunction connecting two consecutive actions done by the same subject, saving you from repeating the tense and person endings. It replaces the word ve (and). Here, it connects darılmak (to take offense) and gelmemek (not to come), meaning they took offense and then didn't come.
The final verb gelmedi is negative. Does that make darılıp negative as well?
No, and this is a tricky but important feature of the -ıp suffix! While the -ıp verb borrows the tense and subject from the final verb, it does not automatically borrow the negative marker. In this sentence, the first action actually happened (they got offended), resulting in the second action not happening (they didn't come). If you wanted to say they 'didn't take offense and didn't come', you would have to make the first verb explicitly negative by saying darılmayıp.
What is the difference between darılıp and küsüp in this context?