Question 1

How does eksik olduğunu mean "that it is missing"?

Accepted Answer

Since eksik (missing) is an adjective, we need the helper verb olmak (to be) to form a "that" clause. We use the participle form olduk, add the 3rd person possessive suffix -u to match the subject of the clause, and finally add the accusative case -nu because the whole clause is the direct object of the main verb.

Question 2

Why is denetim (inspection) in the genitive case as denetimin?

Accepted Answer

In Turkish complement clauses using -dık, the subject of the embedded clause must take the genitive case. Literally, this translates to "the inspection's being missing." Therefore, denetim takes the genitive suffix -in, which logically pairs with the possessive suffix on olduğunu.

Question 3

Why does the complement clause end with the accusative marker in olduğunu?

Accepted Answer

The main verb itiraf etmek (to confess) requires a direct object because you confess something. Here, that something is the entire clause about the missing inspection. The final -u (after the buffer -n-) is the accusative case marking this clause as the direct object of the confession.

Question 4

Why use the reported past tense etmiş instead of the direct past etti?

Accepted Answer

Using the -miş suffix indicates that the speaker did not personally witness the contractors' confession. They likely heard about it on the news, read it in a report, or were told by a third party. The English translation includes the word "reportedly" to accurately capture this evidential nuance.

Müteahhitler inşaatta denetimin eksik olduğunu itiraf etmiş.

Breakdown of Müteahhitler inşaatta denetimin eksik olduğunu itiraf etmiş.

Questions & Answers about Müteahhitler inşaatta denetimin eksik olduğunu itiraf etmiş.

Learn Müteahhitler inşaatta denetimin eksik olduğunu itiraf etmiş and more in Turkish