Föraren måste ha varit vållande till olyckan.

Questions & Answers about Föraren måste ha varit vållande till olyckan.

"Måste" is usually present tense. How does it work here to mean "must have been"?
In Swedish, just like in English, you can use måste followed by the perfect infinitive (ha + supine, which is varit here) to express a strong logical deduction about the past. So måste ha varit perfectly mirrors "must have been".
The word vållande looks like a present participle ending in -ande. How is it being used here?
It is the present participle of the verb vålla (to cause or inflict). In legal and formal contexts, such as talking about traffic accidents, vållande is commonly used as an invariable adjective meaning "at fault" or "responsible".
Why do we use the preposition till instead of för for "for the accident"?
When discussing the cause of an event in Swedish, the standard preposition is till. You use it with vållande just like you use it with orsak (cause), so someone is vållande till or the orsak till an incident.
Could I just use the active verb and say Föraren måste ha vållat olyckan?
Yes, you can! Using the active verb vållat (caused) means essentially the same thing. The phrasing varit vållande till is simply more formal, similar to how police or insurance companies would write "was at fault for" rather than "caused".

Learn Föraren måste ha varit vållande till olyckan and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free