Breakdown of Vulkanen är aktiv, varför seismologen planerar att evakuera.
vara
to be
att
to
planera
to plan
vulkanen
the volcano
aktiv
active
varför
which is why
seismologen
the seismologist
evakuera
to evacuate
Questions & Answers about Vulkanen är aktiv, varför seismologen planerar att evakuera.
Why does varför mean "which is why" instead of asking a question here?
In this sentence, varför functions as a relative adverb rather than a question word. It connects the two clauses by showing the logical consequence of the first clause (the volcano being active). You can think of it as a slightly more formal equivalent to "which is why" or "and therefore".
Is this use of varför common in everyday spoken Swedish?
Not really. This structure is quite formal and mostly found in writing or formal contexts like news reports. In everyday casual conversation, a Swede would be much more likely to use och därför (and therefore) or simply så (so): Vulkanen är aktiv, så seismologen planerar...
Could I use därför att instead of varför in this sentence?
No, because they show the cause-and-effect relationship in opposite directions. därför att means "because" and introduces a cause. varför in this context means "which is why" and introduces the effect or result.
If we added inte (not) to the second clause, where would it go?
It would go before the verb: ...varför seismologen inte planerar att evakuera. Even though this clause carries the story forward like a main clause, varför technically introduces a subordinate relative clause. Therefore, it follows the standard "BIFF" rule where sentence adverbs like inte must come before the conjugated verb.
Learn Vulkanen är aktiv, varför seismologen planerar att evakuera and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free