Vill du kasta det avklippta håret?

Questions & Answers about Vill du kasta det avklippta håret?

Why is it avklippta as one word, instead of two words like the verb klippa av?
This is the rule of obligatory prefixing! When a phrasal verb like klippa av (to cut off) is turned into a past participle to be used as an adjective, the particle (av) must be attached to the front of the word as a prefix. You cannot say det klippta av håret; it must become det avklippta håret.
Why does avklippta end with an -a in this sentence?
Because it is acting as an adjective in a definite phrase. The base past participle is avklippt. However, since the noun phrase is definite (det ... håret), the adjective must take the definite -a ending, becoming avklippta.
The English translation says throw away, but the Swedish sentence just uses kasta. Where is the word for away?
While kasta literally translates to throw, in everyday Swedish it is very commonly used on its own to mean throw away or throw in the trash. You could explicitly say kasta bort or use the verb slänga, but using just kasta is perfectly natural in this context.
Just to review, why do we need both det and the -et ending on håret?
This is the classic Swedish double definiteness rule. When a definite noun like håret has an adjective describing it, you must also add the independent definite article before the adjective. Since hår is an ett word, we use det, making the structure det avklippta håret.

Learn Vill du kasta det avklippta håret and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free