Hennes bortförklaring, den lät helt galen.

Questions & Answers about Hennes bortförklaring, den lät helt galen.

How does the word bortförklaring demonstrate the rule for turning particle verbs into nouns?
It is built from the particle verb förklara bort (to explain away). To turn this action into a noun, the particle bort is shifted to the front as a prefix, and the common noun-forming suffix -ing is added to the verb stem, creating en bortförklaring (an excuse).
Why is there a comma and the extra pronoun den? Couldn't we just say "Hennes bortförklaring lät helt galen"?
You definitely could, and it would be perfectly correct! However, adding the pronoun den after the comma is a conversational structure called left dislocation. It is very common in spoken Swedish to state the topic first for emphasis, and then use a pronoun to comment on it. It matches the casual English phrasing "Her excuse, it sounded..."
Since it follows a verb, why does the sentence use the adjective galen instead of the adverb form galet?
Even though it follows the verb låta (to sound), galen describes the noun bortförklaring, which is an en-word. Verbs related to the senses like låta (to sound), kännas (to feel), and se ut (to look) act as linking verbs, meaning the adjective that follows must agree in gender and number with the subject it describes.
Is there a difference in meaning between en bortförklaring and en ursäkt, since both translate to "excuse"?
Yes, they have distinctly different tones. En ursäkt is usually a genuine apology or a valid, polite reason (like a doctor's note). En bortförklaring carries a negative tone; it implies someone is actively dodging responsibility or making up a flimsy story to "explain away" a fault.

Learn Hennes bortförklaring, den lät helt galen and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free