Breakdown of Enligt traditionen skålas det i parken.
parken
the park
i
in
det
there (dummy subject)
enligt
according to
Questions & Answers about Enligt traditionen skålas det i parken.
Why is there a det here, and why does skåla end in -s?
The verb skåla (to toast) is intransitive, meaning it doesn't take a direct object. When we want to focus purely on the action happening without mentioning who is doing it, we use the s-passive form (skålas). Because every Swedish sentence needs a subject, we use the dummy subject det. Literally, it translates to "it is toasted," but we understand it as "there is toasting" or "people toast."
Why does det come after skålas instead of before it?
This is a reminder of the V2 (verb-second) rule. The sentence starts with the prepositional phrase Enligt traditionen (According to the tradition), which takes up the first position. The verb skålas must come second, so the subject det is forced to the spot immediately after the verb.
Could I just say man skålar instead?
Yes, saying Enligt traditionen skålar man i parken is completely correct and very common. Using the impersonal s-passive (skålas det) instead of man shifts the focus entirely to the event itself rather than the people doing it. It often sounds slightly more formal, established, or atmospheric, which fits well when talking about a tradition.
Can I use this impersonal det + passive construction with any verb?