El tramposo negó el dopaje; por consiguiente, descalificamos al participante.

Questions & Answers about El tramposo negó el dopaje; por consiguiente, descalificamos al participante.

Why use por consiguiente here instead of a simpler word like entonces, and why does it take the indicative?
por consiguiente is a formal connector meaning "consequently" or "therefore." It is perfect for official contexts like enforcing sports rules. Like the other result connectors in this lesson, it introduces a factual outcome of the previous statement, so it triggers the indicative mood (descalificamos), not the subjunctive.
Since negó is in the past tense, could descalificamos also be in the past tense?
Absolutely. For regular -ar and -ir verbs, the nosotros form is exactly the same in both the present and the preterite (simple past) tenses. Even though the provided English translation uses the present tense ("we disqualify"), it could just as easily be translated as "we disqualified" given the past-tense context of the first half of the sentence.
Why do we say al participante and not just el participante?
This is a contraction of the "personal a" and the masculine article el (a + el = al). Because the direct object of the verb descalificamos (the one being disqualified) is a specific person, Spanish requires you to put an a in front of it.
Does the word dopaje come from English?
Yes! It is an adaptation of the English word "doping." Spanish often uses the suffix -aje to create nouns that describe an action or process, frequently using it to adapt foreign terms. Another common example you might have seen is aterrizaje (landing).

Learn El tramposo negó el dopaje; por consiguiente, descalificamos al participante and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free