Question 1

Why do we use the imperfect subjunctive (fuera) here instead of the past indicative (era)?

Accepted Answer

The phrase fue increíble que is a past evaluative clause. It expresses a subjective judgment or reaction to an event. Just like expressing a judgment in the present (es increíble que...) triggers the present subjunctive, doing so in the past requires the past (imperfect) subjunctive.

Question 2

Why use fuera (from ser) instead of estuviera (from estar) to describe the noise? Isn't a loud noise a temporary condition?

Accepted Answer

Even though the noise itself only lasted for a certain time, ensordecedor describes the defining characteristic or nature of that specific noise. When you classify or describe what kind of thing something is, you use ser, regardless of how long the event exists.

Question 3

Why is the first verb (fue) in the preterite instead of the imperfect (era)?

Accepted Answer

Using the preterite fue treats the speaker's reaction as a sudden, completed event (like saying 'at that moment, it was incredible'). If you used the imperfect era, it would set the scene, describing an ongoing background feeling. Both are correct, but fue is more common for a sudden reaction.

Question 4

How do you break down the adjective ensordecedor?

Accepted Answer

It comes from the root sordo (deaf). By adding the prefix en- and suffix -ecer, you get the verb ensordecer (to deafen). Finally, adding the suffix -edor turns it into the adjective ensordecedor (deafening). Spotting these patterns helps you instantly recognize complex vocabulary.

Fue increíble que el ruido fuera ensordecedor.

Breakdown of Fue increíble que el ruido fuera ensordecedor.

Questions & Answers about Fue increíble que el ruido fuera ensordecedor.

Learn Fue increíble que el ruido fuera ensordecedor and more in Spanish