Breakdown of Изучая древнюю архитектуру, мы нашли артефакт, скрытый под землёй.
мы
we
изучать
to study
найти
to find
под
under
Questions & Answers about Изучая древнюю архитектуру, мы нашли артефакт, скрытый под землёй.
How would we express скрытый под землёй using a который clause?
You would say который был скрыт под землёй. The participle phrase скрытый под землёй (hidden underground) is a syntactic reduction that replaces the full relative clause. Since the main action нашли is in the past, the который clause needs the past tense verb был alongside the short-form participle скрыт.
Why do we use the full-form participle скрытый here instead of the short form скрыт?
When a passive participle directly modifies a noun inside a phrase, it must take the full form to show case agreement, just like an adjective. The short form is only used when the participle acts as the main verb (the predicate) of a clause, such as in the sentence артефакт был скрыт (the artifact was hidden).
What case is скрытый in, and why does it look like the nominative case?
It is in the accusative case, agreeing with the direct object артефакт. Because артефакт is a masculine inanimate noun, its accusative form is identical to its nominative form. The participle modifying it follows the exact same rule, so скрытый takes the inanimate accusative ending, which is identical to the nominative.
Could изучая refer to someone else studying the architecture while we found the artifact?