Breakdown of Ktoś rozsypał cukier na stole.
stół
table
na
on, at / to (motion toward) / for (a meal) / for (waiting for)
cukier
sugar
ktoś
somebody
Questions & Answers about Ktoś rozsypał cukier na stole.
How does the prefix roz- change the meaning of the verb in rozsypał?
The base verb sypać means to pour or sprinkle dry, powdery things. The prefix roz- adds the meaning of spreading something out in all directions or dispersing it. Together, rozsypać means to scatter or spill a dry substance, usually by accident.
If "spilled" is rozsypał, when do we use rozlał?
It depends on what you are spilling! Polish makes a strict distinction between spilling dry, granular things like sugar, sand, or salt (rozsypać) and spilling liquids like water or coffee (rozlać). Since sugar is dry, we must use rozsypał.
Why is cukier in its dictionary form here? Shouldn't it change its ending?
Cukier is the direct object of the action, so it is in the accusative case. Because it is a masculine inanimate noun, its accusative form looks exactly the same as its nominative (dictionary) form. If the sentence were negative (Someone didn't spill sugar), it would take the genitive case instead: Ktoś nie rozsypał cukru.
What happens to the spelling of stół (table) in the phrase na stole?